Socio-technical knowledge for robust decision making in radioactive waste governance

Thomas Flüeler, R. Scholz
{"title":"Socio-technical knowledge for robust decision making in radioactive waste governance","authors":"Thomas Flüeler, R. Scholz","doi":"10.1080/14664530490464806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The long-term governance of radioactive waste (RWG) is a complex socio-technical issue. This empirically based contribution provides a novel approach on how to complement technical expertise with stakeholder involvement and knowledge. It proposes an integrated overall system and procedure that provide robustness in a sustainable RWG: It is a combination of (1) technical design issues, (2) a variety of analysis methods and (3) institutional backup within a (4) dynamic procedure allowing for reasonable participation. The findings suggest that controllability, retrievability, and procedural issues such as transparency, traceability of arguments, and inclusive participation, are key elements in an integrative evaluation. Sustained and safety-oriented compromise can only, if at all, be achieved if collective learning and capacity building takes place. This requires that all relevant stakeholder views be considered. As a complement to the knowledge frameworks of all participants and to linking their relations, ...","PeriodicalId":212131,"journal":{"name":"Risk Decision and Policy","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Decision and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14664530490464806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The long-term governance of radioactive waste (RWG) is a complex socio-technical issue. This empirically based contribution provides a novel approach on how to complement technical expertise with stakeholder involvement and knowledge. It proposes an integrated overall system and procedure that provide robustness in a sustainable RWG: It is a combination of (1) technical design issues, (2) a variety of analysis methods and (3) institutional backup within a (4) dynamic procedure allowing for reasonable participation. The findings suggest that controllability, retrievability, and procedural issues such as transparency, traceability of arguments, and inclusive participation, are key elements in an integrative evaluation. Sustained and safety-oriented compromise can only, if at all, be achieved if collective learning and capacity building takes place. This requires that all relevant stakeholder views be considered. As a complement to the knowledge frameworks of all participants and to linking their relations, ...
在放射性废物治理稳健决策的社会技术知识
放射性废物的长期治理是一个复杂的社会技术问题。这种基于经验的贡献提供了一种关于如何用利益相关者参与和知识补充技术专长的新方法。它提出了一个集成的整体系统和程序,为可持续的RWG提供稳健性:它是(1)技术设计问题,(2)各种分析方法和(3)在(4)允许合理参与的动态程序中的机构备份的组合。研究结果表明,可控性、可检索性和程序性问题,如透明度、论证的可追溯性和包容性参与,是综合评估的关键要素。只有在进行集体学习和能力建设的情况下,才能实现持久和面向安全的妥协。这要求考虑所有相关利益相关者的意见。作为对所有参与者的知识框架的补充,并连接他们之间的关系,…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信