Keeping Women in Business (and Family)

R. Wilson
{"title":"Keeping Women in Business (and Family)","authors":"R. Wilson","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1115468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Work and family have become either/or propositions for a growing segment of young professionals in business, law, and medicine. A well documented opt-out revolution is underway, in which women professionals are leaving the workplace in droves. Less appreciated is the converse phenomenon: huge numbers of female, and male, professionals who remain in the workplace but opt out of family. These men and women forego parenting and stable, long-term relationships in surprisingly high numbers, believing they cannot have both. This Chapter documents the extent of this break from family for professional men and women. Using the 2003 National Survey of College Graduates, this Chapter shows that among professionals, long-term adult relationships often take a beating, but that women outstrip men in the number of failing personal relationships. Women with MBAs are divorced or separated more often than college graduates and they split up over twice as often as men with the same degree. Women with JDs and MDs are also more likely to divorce or separate than their male counterparts in the same profession. The complete break from marriage tells an even starker story. 21% of women with JDs and 17% of women with MBAs have never married, compared to 14% of women college graduates. Importantly, never married women with MBAs outnumber their male counterparts almost three to one, a gap that closes only somewhat for doctors and lawyers. Most examinations of the opt-out revolution emphasize almost exclusively what employers can and should do to support family. This Chapter starts closer to home with graduate educators. In many ways, young professionals learn to treat work and family as either/or choices at the very beginning of their graduate professional educations. The intense time demands and pressures of graduate professional education teach students early on to place professional obligations over the personal at every turn. Far from being solely a problem for employers to remedy, graduate professional schools themselves must take an active role. This Chapter will explore what graduate professional programs can do to change the calculus that young professionals engage in when deciding whether to combine family and work. It argues that professional schools can change the culture of graduate education and thus the expectations of young professionals with a number of straight-forward, concrete measures. Graduate educators can support family by modeling good behavior in our own institutions, decreasing the admission age for women, giving preference in admissions to applicants with children, providing financial support for student-parents in the form of scholarships and better loan terms, establishing alumni mentoring networks, and outlining for students the real costs of various practice settings for forming and maintaining families. Once armed with stronger expectations that they can have both, these young professionals will be important agents for transforming the workplace from the inside out.","PeriodicalId":330356,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1115468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Work and family have become either/or propositions for a growing segment of young professionals in business, law, and medicine. A well documented opt-out revolution is underway, in which women professionals are leaving the workplace in droves. Less appreciated is the converse phenomenon: huge numbers of female, and male, professionals who remain in the workplace but opt out of family. These men and women forego parenting and stable, long-term relationships in surprisingly high numbers, believing they cannot have both. This Chapter documents the extent of this break from family for professional men and women. Using the 2003 National Survey of College Graduates, this Chapter shows that among professionals, long-term adult relationships often take a beating, but that women outstrip men in the number of failing personal relationships. Women with MBAs are divorced or separated more often than college graduates and they split up over twice as often as men with the same degree. Women with JDs and MDs are also more likely to divorce or separate than their male counterparts in the same profession. The complete break from marriage tells an even starker story. 21% of women with JDs and 17% of women with MBAs have never married, compared to 14% of women college graduates. Importantly, never married women with MBAs outnumber their male counterparts almost three to one, a gap that closes only somewhat for doctors and lawyers. Most examinations of the opt-out revolution emphasize almost exclusively what employers can and should do to support family. This Chapter starts closer to home with graduate educators. In many ways, young professionals learn to treat work and family as either/or choices at the very beginning of their graduate professional educations. The intense time demands and pressures of graduate professional education teach students early on to place professional obligations over the personal at every turn. Far from being solely a problem for employers to remedy, graduate professional schools themselves must take an active role. This Chapter will explore what graduate professional programs can do to change the calculus that young professionals engage in when deciding whether to combine family and work. It argues that professional schools can change the culture of graduate education and thus the expectations of young professionals with a number of straight-forward, concrete measures. Graduate educators can support family by modeling good behavior in our own institutions, decreasing the admission age for women, giving preference in admissions to applicants with children, providing financial support for student-parents in the form of scholarships and better loan terms, establishing alumni mentoring networks, and outlining for students the real costs of various practice settings for forming and maintaining families. Once armed with stronger expectations that they can have both, these young professionals will be important agents for transforming the workplace from the inside out.
让女性留在企业(和家庭)
对于越来越多的商界、法律界和医学界的年轻专业人士来说,工作和家庭已经成为非此即彼的命题。一场有据可查的选择退出革命正在进行,在这场革命中,女性专业人士正在成群结队地离开工作场所。不太受重视的是相反的现象:大量的女性和男性专业人士留在工作场所,但选择离开家庭。这些男人和女人放弃养育子女和稳定、长期的关系的比例高得惊人,他们认为自己不能两者兼得。本章记录了职业男女脱离家庭的程度。本章利用2003年全国大学毕业生调查显示,在专业人士中,长期的成人关系经常受到打击,但在个人关系失败的数量上,女性比男性多。拥有mba学位的女性比大学毕业生更容易离婚或分居,她们的分居率是拥有相同学位的男性的两倍多。拥有法学博士和医学博士学位的女性也比从事相同职业的男性更容易离婚或分居。婚姻的彻底破裂讲述了一个更加残酷的故事。21%拥有法学博士学位的女性和17%拥有mba学位的女性从未结婚,而大学毕业生中这一比例为14%。重要的是,从未结过婚的mba女性与男性的比例几乎为3:1,这一差距仅在医生和律师领域有所缩小。大多数关于“选择退出”革命的考试几乎都只强调雇主能够和应该做些什么来支持家庭。本章从研究生教育工作者开始。在许多方面,年轻的专业人士在研究生专业教育的一开始就学会了将工作和家庭视为非此即彼的选择。研究生专业教育的时间要求和压力很大,很早就教会学生在任何时候都要把专业责任置于个人责任之上。这不仅仅是雇主需要解决的问题,研究生专业学院本身也必须发挥积极作用。本章将探讨研究生专业课程可以做些什么来改变年轻专业人士在决定是否将家庭和工作结合起来时所做的计算。它认为,专业学校可以通过一些直接、具体的措施改变研究生教育的文化,从而改变年轻专业人士的期望。研究生教育工作者可以通过以下方式来支持家庭:在我们自己的机构中树立良好的行为榜样,降低女性的入学年龄,优先录取有孩子的申请人,以奖学金和更好的贷款条款的形式为学生家长提供经济支持,建立校友指导网络,并为学生概述组建和维持家庭的各种实践环境的实际成本。一旦有了更强的期望,这些年轻的专业人士就会成为从内到外改变工作场所的重要推动者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信