{"title":"The optimum Booth radix for low power integer multipliers","authors":"H. Saleh, B. Mohammad, E. Swartzlander","doi":"10.1109/IDT.2013.6727119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the optimum Booth integer multiplier for low power applications. Booth radix-4, radix-8 and radix-16 were compared for area, speed and power using standard-cell ASIC design flow and 28nm CMOS technology. All of the investigated designs were implemented in RTL, fully verified and then synthesized using 28nm standard-cell libraries which have low leakage slow cells, regular leakage average-speed cells and high-leakage fast-speed cells. The area, speed and power were compared to determine the best choice for low power designs. Among the three investigated designs, the Booth radix-4 was the best choice, it had the lowest area, power and fastest execution speed among the 3-choices. It is worthy of note that radix-8 had lower leakage power and overall power among the three designs when implemented using LVT cells. So for power sensitive and high-speed applications radix-8 could be a better choice with overhead of about 18% area and 3% slower.","PeriodicalId":446826,"journal":{"name":"2013 8th IEEE Design and Test Symposium","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 8th IEEE Design and Test Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IDT.2013.6727119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
This paper investigates the optimum Booth integer multiplier for low power applications. Booth radix-4, radix-8 and radix-16 were compared for area, speed and power using standard-cell ASIC design flow and 28nm CMOS technology. All of the investigated designs were implemented in RTL, fully verified and then synthesized using 28nm standard-cell libraries which have low leakage slow cells, regular leakage average-speed cells and high-leakage fast-speed cells. The area, speed and power were compared to determine the best choice for low power designs. Among the three investigated designs, the Booth radix-4 was the best choice, it had the lowest area, power and fastest execution speed among the 3-choices. It is worthy of note that radix-8 had lower leakage power and overall power among the three designs when implemented using LVT cells. So for power sensitive and high-speed applications radix-8 could be a better choice with overhead of about 18% area and 3% slower.