How do biological networks differ from social networks? (an experimental study)

Tatiana Gutierrez-Bunster, U. Stege, Alex Thomo, John Taylor
{"title":"How do biological networks differ from social networks? (an experimental study)","authors":"Tatiana Gutierrez-Bunster, U. Stege, Alex Thomo, John Taylor","doi":"10.1109/ASONAM.2014.6921669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we outline important differences between (1) protein interaction networks and (2) social and other complex networks, in terms of fine-grained network community profiles. While these families of networks present some general similarities, they also have some stark differences in the way the communities are formed. Namely, we find that the sizes of the best communities in such biological networks are an order of magnitude smaller than in social and other complex networks. We furthermore find that the generative model describing biological networks is very different from the model describing social networks. While for latter the Forest-Fire model best approximates their network community profile, for biological networks it is a random rewiring model that generates networks with the observed profiles. Our study suggests that these families of networks should be treated differently when deriving results from network analysis, and a fine-grained analysis is needed to better understand their structure.","PeriodicalId":143584,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2014)","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2014)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2014.6921669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

In this paper we outline important differences between (1) protein interaction networks and (2) social and other complex networks, in terms of fine-grained network community profiles. While these families of networks present some general similarities, they also have some stark differences in the way the communities are formed. Namely, we find that the sizes of the best communities in such biological networks are an order of magnitude smaller than in social and other complex networks. We furthermore find that the generative model describing biological networks is very different from the model describing social networks. While for latter the Forest-Fire model best approximates their network community profile, for biological networks it is a random rewiring model that generates networks with the observed profiles. Our study suggests that these families of networks should be treated differently when deriving results from network analysis, and a fine-grained analysis is needed to better understand their structure.
生物网络与社会网络有何不同?(实验性研究)
在本文中,我们概述了(1)蛋白质相互作用网络和(2)社会和其他复杂网络之间的重要区别,就细粒度网络社区概况而言。虽然这些网络家族呈现出一些普遍的相似之处,但它们在社区形成的方式上也存在一些明显的差异。也就是说,我们发现在这种生物网络中,最佳社区的规模比社会和其他复杂网络小一个数量级。我们进一步发现描述生物网络的生成模型与描述社会网络的模型有很大的不同。而对于后者,森林火灾模型最接近他们的网络社区概况,对于生物网络,它是一个随机的重新布线模型,产生具有观察到的概况的网络。我们的研究表明,在从网络分析中得出结果时,应该区别对待这些网络家族,并且需要进行细粒度分析以更好地理解它们的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信