Engagement In a Virtual Learning on Two Social Networks Of An Engineering course using the Social Network Analysis- An approach using a case study

Samuel Eneje, S. Sanni, C. F. Pereira
{"title":"Engagement In a Virtual Learning on Two Social Networks Of An Engineering course using the Social Network Analysis- An approach using a case study","authors":"Samuel Eneje, S. Sanni, C. F. Pereira","doi":"10.1109/CCECE47787.2020.9255723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate learning engagements in two social networks-blog and Facebook, used for engineering course as a scale-up handle to examine the students ‘participation in learning. The research question it used is finding the extent of studenf's engagement on the formal and the informal virtual learning sites. Engineering students' class' social network sites were used for the class activity and dataset was built from their interactions which further provides the social network analysis and statistical tool data to analyze metrics and properties. Collaborated groups were created by social network analysis. It investigated the connections of participants and unveiled network structure of participants' interactions. It found that a structured network such as Facebook are better suitable for learning interactions than a slapdash structured social network site. The study also found that students are more inclined to the former than the blog. The results provide an enlightenment and prior step to choosing appropriate sites should learning be situated on social network sites supplement to laboratory's introductory.","PeriodicalId":296506,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE47787.2020.9255723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aims to investigate learning engagements in two social networks-blog and Facebook, used for engineering course as a scale-up handle to examine the students ‘participation in learning. The research question it used is finding the extent of studenf's engagement on the formal and the informal virtual learning sites. Engineering students' class' social network sites were used for the class activity and dataset was built from their interactions which further provides the social network analysis and statistical tool data to analyze metrics and properties. Collaborated groups were created by social network analysis. It investigated the connections of participants and unveiled network structure of participants' interactions. It found that a structured network such as Facebook are better suitable for learning interactions than a slapdash structured social network site. The study also found that students are more inclined to the former than the blog. The results provide an enlightenment and prior step to choosing appropriate sites should learning be situated on social network sites supplement to laboratory's introductory.
使用社会网络分析在工程课程的两个社会网络上进行虚拟学习-一种使用案例研究的方法
本研究的目的是调查两个社会网络-博客和Facebook的学习参与,用于工程课程作为一个放大把手来检查学生的学习参与。它使用的研究问题是发现学生对正式和非正式虚拟学习网站的参与程度。利用工科学生的班级社交网站进行班级活动,并从他们的互动中建立数据集,进一步提供社会网络分析和统计工具数据来分析指标和属性。协作小组是通过社会网络分析创建的。研究了参与者之间的联系,揭示了参与者互动的网络结构。研究发现,像Facebook这样的结构化网络比草率的结构化社交网站更适合学习互动。研究还发现,学生们更倾向于前者,而不是博客。研究结果为在实验室介绍的基础上选择合适的社交网站提供了启示和先导性步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信