Comparative evaluation of hydroxyapatite fluoride and casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride as remineralizing agents in primary teeth using pH cycling and single-sectioning technique

M. Nair, R. Patil, S. Bahutule
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of hydroxyapatite fluoride and casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride as remineralizing agents in primary teeth using pH cycling and single-sectioning technique","authors":"M. Nair, R. Patil, S. Bahutule","doi":"10.4103/ijmo.ijmo_15_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hydroxyapatite and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate are known to remineralize subsurface carious lesions. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of topical application of hydroxyapatite fluoride (HF) and caseinphosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride paste (CPP-ACPF) in bringing about remineralization changes in artificially induced carious lesions of primary teeth using pH cycling and single-sectioning technique. Materials and Methods: Seventy extracted deciduous teeth were divided into two groups: Group A: HF (Remin Pro) n = 35 and Group B: CPP-ACPF (Tooth Mousse Plus®) n = 35. The samples were immersed in demineralizing solution for 96 h followed by pH cycling for 10 days which included cycles of demineralization and remineralization of their respective groups. Results: Intergroup comparison of the change in the mean value after demineralization and remineralization showed statistically highly significant difference as the change in Group A HF was 213.52 ± 113.17 (standard deviation [SD]) as compared to that in Group B (CPP-ACPF) 76 ± 57.22 (SD). Conclusion: HF was found to be better when compared to CPP-ACPF for tooth remineralization.","PeriodicalId":360415,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical and Oral Research","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical and Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmo.ijmo_15_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Hydroxyapatite and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate are known to remineralize subsurface carious lesions. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of topical application of hydroxyapatite fluoride (HF) and caseinphosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride paste (CPP-ACPF) in bringing about remineralization changes in artificially induced carious lesions of primary teeth using pH cycling and single-sectioning technique. Materials and Methods: Seventy extracted deciduous teeth were divided into two groups: Group A: HF (Remin Pro) n = 35 and Group B: CPP-ACPF (Tooth Mousse Plus®) n = 35. The samples were immersed in demineralizing solution for 96 h followed by pH cycling for 10 days which included cycles of demineralization and remineralization of their respective groups. Results: Intergroup comparison of the change in the mean value after demineralization and remineralization showed statistically highly significant difference as the change in Group A HF was 213.52 ± 113.17 (standard deviation [SD]) as compared to that in Group B (CPP-ACPF) 76 ± 57.22 (SD). Conclusion: HF was found to be better when compared to CPP-ACPF for tooth remineralization.
应用pH循环和单次切片技术比较评价羟基磷灰石氟化物和酪蛋白磷酸肽无定形磷酸钙氟化物作为乳牙再矿化剂的作用
背景:羟基磷灰石和酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形磷酸钙是已知的再矿化表面下的龋齿病变。目的:采用pH循环和单次切片技术,观察羟基磷灰石氟化物(HF)和酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形氟化磷酸钙糊剂(CPP-ACPF)外用对人工牙龋齿再矿化的影响。材料与方法:将70颗拔除的乳牙分为两组:A组HF (Remin Pro) n = 35, B组CPP-ACPF (Tooth Mousse Plus®)n = 35。样品在脱矿液中浸泡96 h, pH循环10 d,包括各自组的脱矿和再矿循环。结果:组间比较脱矿和再矿化后HF的平均值变化,A组HF变化为213.52±113.17(标准差[SD]), B组(CPP-ACPF)为76±57.22 (SD)。结论:与CPP-ACPF相比,HF对牙再矿化效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信