Dalla copia al falso al ‘secondo originale’ Percorsi di slittamento di senso e di significato tra materiale e virtuale

Laura Lombardi
{"title":"Dalla copia al falso al ‘secondo originale’\n Percorsi di slittamento di senso e di significato tra materiale e virtuale","authors":"Laura Lombardi","doi":"10.30687/va/2385-2720/2021/07/009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article investigates the relationship between ‘copy’ and ‘fake’ and the ambiguous status of these definitions in the artistic practices of recent decades. Episodes narrated in art history primary sources are compared with twentieth and twenty-first-century episodes. Thus, one comes to the notion of fake in contemporaneity, which no longer has a negative meaning. On the contrary, it has become an acknowledged artistic practice, a means that reveals the mise-en-scène that each image represents by declaring itself as ‘true’. Also, the notion of a ‘second original’, obtained thanks to contemporary technologies, calls into question the Benjaminian notion of the artwork’s ‘aura’.","PeriodicalId":311787,"journal":{"name":"Original/Copy","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Original/Copy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30687/va/2385-2720/2021/07/009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article investigates the relationship between ‘copy’ and ‘fake’ and the ambiguous status of these definitions in the artistic practices of recent decades. Episodes narrated in art history primary sources are compared with twentieth and twenty-first-century episodes. Thus, one comes to the notion of fake in contemporaneity, which no longer has a negative meaning. On the contrary, it has become an acknowledged artistic practice, a means that reveals the mise-en-scène that each image represents by declaring itself as ‘true’. Also, the notion of a ‘second original’, obtained thanks to contemporary technologies, calls into question the Benjaminian notion of the artwork’s ‘aura’.
从复制到赝品,再到“第二原版”,材料和虚拟之间的意义和意义转移路径
本文探讨了“复制”与“伪造”的关系,以及近几十年来这两个概念在艺术实践中的模糊地位。将艺术史原始资料中叙述的情节与二十世纪和二十一世纪的情节进行比较。因此,我们在当代性中提出了假的概念,它不再具有否定的意义。相反,它已经成为一种公认的艺术实践,一种通过宣称自己是“真实的”来揭示每个图像所代表的场景的手段。此外,由于当代技术而获得的“第二原作”的概念,对本杰明关于艺术品“光环”的概念提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信