{"title":"Critically Engaged Civic learning: Graphic Design as a Bridge Between the Classroom and the Local Community","authors":"C. Bernasconi","doi":"10.35483/acsa.am.111.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses outcomes from a collaborative project between the School of Architecture and Community Development at Detroit Mercy and the LIVE6 Alliance, a Detroit non-profit organization focusing on neighborhood revitalization via placemaking and engagement with small businesses. A graduate graphic design course was offered in Winter 2020, and provided an opportunity for architecture students to interact with local community members and business owners to brainstorm ideas about identity, place, and economic development. Through an iterative and open-ended process revolving around frequent conversations and concept proposals, students learned to interpret key identity traits of local businesses, to acknowledge the values they bring to the urban corridor, and applied graphic design knowledge built in the classroom to develop alternative branding design ideas. The pedagogical approach of the course aligns with the frameworks of Critically Engaged Civic Learning (Vincent et al. 2021) and Critical Service learning (Mitchell 2008). Embracing these frameworks in the course helped students understand perspectives of community partners and become more aware of their design agency as co-creators. Forms of co-production and co-authorship were fostered to decolonize the design process, building on authentic relationships and a deeper understanding of branding as a defining way of expressing values of individuals, communities and places. At the urban scale, the loosely coordinated collective work of all teams along the corridor, spurred students to understand graphic design as an urban activator and as an element of placemaking at the scale of the neighborhood. The project was interrupted during online and hybrid learning. This hiatus provided time to reflect on lessons learned, including learning outcomes for students and community perceptions, and directions for future collaborations with LIVE6 Alliance towards a student learning that is centered around the search for a co-constructed design agency.","PeriodicalId":243862,"journal":{"name":"In Commons","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Commons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.111.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper discusses outcomes from a collaborative project between the School of Architecture and Community Development at Detroit Mercy and the LIVE6 Alliance, a Detroit non-profit organization focusing on neighborhood revitalization via placemaking and engagement with small businesses. A graduate graphic design course was offered in Winter 2020, and provided an opportunity for architecture students to interact with local community members and business owners to brainstorm ideas about identity, place, and economic development. Through an iterative and open-ended process revolving around frequent conversations and concept proposals, students learned to interpret key identity traits of local businesses, to acknowledge the values they bring to the urban corridor, and applied graphic design knowledge built in the classroom to develop alternative branding design ideas. The pedagogical approach of the course aligns with the frameworks of Critically Engaged Civic Learning (Vincent et al. 2021) and Critical Service learning (Mitchell 2008). Embracing these frameworks in the course helped students understand perspectives of community partners and become more aware of their design agency as co-creators. Forms of co-production and co-authorship were fostered to decolonize the design process, building on authentic relationships and a deeper understanding of branding as a defining way of expressing values of individuals, communities and places. At the urban scale, the loosely coordinated collective work of all teams along the corridor, spurred students to understand graphic design as an urban activator and as an element of placemaking at the scale of the neighborhood. The project was interrupted during online and hybrid learning. This hiatus provided time to reflect on lessons learned, including learning outcomes for students and community perceptions, and directions for future collaborations with LIVE6 Alliance towards a student learning that is centered around the search for a co-constructed design agency.
本文讨论了底特律仁慈大学建筑与社区发展学院与LIVE6联盟合作项目的成果,LIVE6联盟是底特律的一个非营利组织,专注于通过场所建设和小企业参与来振兴社区。2020年冬季开设了研究生平面设计课程,为建筑专业的学生提供了与当地社区成员和企业主互动的机会,以集思广益,了解身份、地点和经济发展。通过围绕频繁的对话和概念提案的迭代和开放式过程,学生们学会了解释当地企业的关键身份特征,承认他们为城市走廊带来的价值,并应用课堂上建立的平面设计知识来开发替代品牌设计理念。该课程的教学方法与批判性参与公民学习(Vincent et al. 2021)和批判性服务学习(Mitchell 2008)的框架保持一致。在课程中采用这些框架有助于学生理解社区合作伙伴的观点,并更加意识到他们的设计机构是共同创造者。合作制作和共同创作的形式是为了使设计过程非殖民化,建立在真实的关系和对品牌作为表达个人、社区和地方价值的定义方式的更深层次的理解之上。在城市尺度上,沿着走廊的所有团队的松散协调的集体工作,促使学生将平面设计理解为城市的激活器和社区尺度上的场所创造元素。该项目在在线和混合学习期间中断。这段时间为反思所学到的经验教训提供了时间,包括学生的学习成果和社区的看法,以及未来与LIVE6联盟合作的方向,以寻找共同构建的设计机构为中心,让学生学习。