A Novel Technique to Minimising Mean Square Error in Stock Price Index Prediction Utilising Logistics Regression and LSTM Model

C. Ebenesh, R. S. Kumar, Ezhil Grace. A
{"title":"A Novel Technique to Minimising Mean Square Error in Stock Price Index Prediction Utilising Logistics Regression and LSTM Model","authors":"C. Ebenesh, R. S. Kumar, Ezhil Grace. A","doi":"10.1109/ACCAI58221.2023.10201122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The methodology that is recommended makes an attempt to anticipate and forecast changes in the price indices of the stock market for three specific equities that are traded on the stock market. The stock market is comprised of all of the many types of equities that are now being discussed. This paradigm makes an attempt to classify two unique types of classification algorithms, namely Long-Term Memory (LSTM) and Logistics Regression (LR). Long-Term Memory is an acronym for \"Long-Term Memory,\" while Logistics Regression is an acronym for \"LR.\" (LSTM). One of the criteria that is used to assess the performance of the models is the ability of both models to accurately anticipate the movement of an index that is traded on the Bombay Stock Exchange. (BSE). For the purposes of performing a study of the suggested structure for the projection of three stocks, an estimated total of thirty different participants were used. (AAPL, MSFT, and AMZN). When comparing the two models' levels of performance, it was found that the LR model (99.8%) performed substantially better than the LTSM model (72.3%) on average. This was noticed while conducting the comparison. (p0.05). When it comes to predicting stock indices by making use of the various parameters, the LR model performed noticeably better than the LTSM model.","PeriodicalId":382104,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Applied Informatics (ACCAI)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Applied Informatics (ACCAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCAI58221.2023.10201122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The methodology that is recommended makes an attempt to anticipate and forecast changes in the price indices of the stock market for three specific equities that are traded on the stock market. The stock market is comprised of all of the many types of equities that are now being discussed. This paradigm makes an attempt to classify two unique types of classification algorithms, namely Long-Term Memory (LSTM) and Logistics Regression (LR). Long-Term Memory is an acronym for "Long-Term Memory," while Logistics Regression is an acronym for "LR." (LSTM). One of the criteria that is used to assess the performance of the models is the ability of both models to accurately anticipate the movement of an index that is traded on the Bombay Stock Exchange. (BSE). For the purposes of performing a study of the suggested structure for the projection of three stocks, an estimated total of thirty different participants were used. (AAPL, MSFT, and AMZN). When comparing the two models' levels of performance, it was found that the LR model (99.8%) performed substantially better than the LTSM model (72.3%) on average. This was noticed while conducting the comparison. (p0.05). When it comes to predicting stock indices by making use of the various parameters, the LR model performed noticeably better than the LTSM model.
利用logistic回归和LSTM模型最小化股价指数预测均方误差的新技术
推荐的方法试图预测和预测在股票市场上交易的三种特定股票的股票市场价格指数的变化。股票市场由现在正在讨论的所有许多类型的股票组成。该范式试图对两种独特的分类算法进行分类,即长期记忆(LSTM)和逻辑回归(LR)。长期记忆是“长期记忆”的缩写,而逻辑回归是“LR”的缩写。(LSTM)。用于评估模型性能的标准之一是两个模型准确预测在孟买证券交易所交易的指数走势的能力。(疯牛病)。为了对预测三种种群的建议结构进行研究,估计总共使用了30个不同的参与者。(苹果、微软和亚马逊)。在比较两种模型的性能水平时,我们发现LR模型(99.8%)的平均性能明显优于LTSM模型(72.3%)。这是在进行比较时注意到的。(p0.05)。当涉及到利用各种参数预测股票指数时,LR模型的表现明显优于LTSM模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信