A framework for risk-aware role based access control

K. Bijon, R. Krishnan, R. Sandhu
{"title":"A framework for risk-aware role based access control","authors":"K. Bijon, R. Krishnan, R. Sandhu","doi":"10.1109/CNS.2013.6682761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the years, role based access control (RBAC) has remained a dominant form of access control both in the industry and academia. More recently, the need for risk awareness in access control has received considerable attention in the research community in light of issues such as insider threats. Although RBAC facilitates risk mitigation via features such as constraints (e.g. static and dynamic separation of duty), a quantified approach of risk awareness/mitigation has emerged as a promising research theme due to its inherent flexibility. In this approach, risk/cost metrics are computed for various entities involved in access control such as users and objects and a risk threshold limits the permissions that can be exercised. The quantified approach accommodates dynamism in access decisions based on contexts/situations such as an employee accessing a sensitive file using a work computer versus accessing using her own device. In this paper, we analyze the difference between the traditional constraint-based risk mitigation and the recent quantified risk-aware approaches in RBAC and propose a framework for introducing risk-awareness in RBAC models that incorporates quantified-risk. We also provide a formal specification of an adaptive risk-aware RBAC model by enhancing the NIST core RBAC model.","PeriodicalId":347620,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security (CNS)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security (CNS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CNS.2013.6682761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

Over the years, role based access control (RBAC) has remained a dominant form of access control both in the industry and academia. More recently, the need for risk awareness in access control has received considerable attention in the research community in light of issues such as insider threats. Although RBAC facilitates risk mitigation via features such as constraints (e.g. static and dynamic separation of duty), a quantified approach of risk awareness/mitigation has emerged as a promising research theme due to its inherent flexibility. In this approach, risk/cost metrics are computed for various entities involved in access control such as users and objects and a risk threshold limits the permissions that can be exercised. The quantified approach accommodates dynamism in access decisions based on contexts/situations such as an employee accessing a sensitive file using a work computer versus accessing using her own device. In this paper, we analyze the difference between the traditional constraint-based risk mitigation and the recent quantified risk-aware approaches in RBAC and propose a framework for introducing risk-awareness in RBAC models that incorporates quantified-risk. We also provide a formal specification of an adaptive risk-aware RBAC model by enhancing the NIST core RBAC model.
基于风险感知角色的访问控制框架
多年来,基于角色的访问控制(RBAC)一直是工业界和学术界访问控制的主要形式。最近,由于内部威胁等问题,访问控制中风险意识的必要性在研究界受到了相当大的关注。尽管RBAC通过约束(例如静态和动态职责分离)等特性促进了风险缓解,但由于其固有的灵活性,风险意识/缓解的量化方法已成为一个有前途的研究主题。在这种方法中,风险/成本度量是为访问控制中涉及的各种实体(如用户和对象)计算的,风险阈值限制了可以行使的权限。量化的方法适应了基于上下文/情况的访问决策的动态性,例如员工使用工作计算机访问敏感文件,而不是使用自己的设备访问。在本文中,我们分析了传统的基于约束的风险缓解方法与最近的量化风险意识方法在RBAC中的区别,并提出了一个在RBAC模型中引入量化风险意识的框架。我们还通过增强NIST核心RBAC模型,提供了自适应风险感知RBAC模型的正式规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信