Mechanistic, empirical and numerical perspectives on wind-waves interaction

Tihomir Hristov
{"title":"Mechanistic, empirical and numerical perspectives on wind-waves interaction","authors":"Tihomir Hristov","doi":"10.1016/j.piutam.2018.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A mechanistic theory of wind-wave interaction must rely on verifiable assumptions and offer reproducible observable predictions. For decades, the limited mechanistic grasp on the problem has motivated RANS and LES modeling and has driven a vast empirical effort to describe the interaction in terms of wave-induced modifications of standard statistical characteristics of the wind, such as wind profile, kinetic energy balance or exchange coefficients. Because the mechanistic, empirical and numerical approaches are all concerned with the same phenomenon occurring in the same media, consistency here requires that the assumptions on which the approaches rest and the predictions they generate are compatible with each other and supported by measurements. Recent findings from theoretical analysis and field experiments advanced the understanding of the statistical and dynamic patterns of the wave-coherent flow, which is at the core of the mechanistic description of the wind-wave exchange. The progress prompts reexamining of earlier concepts, efforts and findings to evaluate their suitability, validity and usefulness. For the purpose, this survey traces the development of ideas, methods and results in the study of the wind wave generation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74499,"journal":{"name":"Procedia IUTAM","volume":"26 ","pages":"Pages 102-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.piutam.2018.03.010","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia IUTAM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210983818300105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

A mechanistic theory of wind-wave interaction must rely on verifiable assumptions and offer reproducible observable predictions. For decades, the limited mechanistic grasp on the problem has motivated RANS and LES modeling and has driven a vast empirical effort to describe the interaction in terms of wave-induced modifications of standard statistical characteristics of the wind, such as wind profile, kinetic energy balance or exchange coefficients. Because the mechanistic, empirical and numerical approaches are all concerned with the same phenomenon occurring in the same media, consistency here requires that the assumptions on which the approaches rest and the predictions they generate are compatible with each other and supported by measurements. Recent findings from theoretical analysis and field experiments advanced the understanding of the statistical and dynamic patterns of the wave-coherent flow, which is at the core of the mechanistic description of the wind-wave exchange. The progress prompts reexamining of earlier concepts, efforts and findings to evaluate their suitability, validity and usefulness. For the purpose, this survey traces the development of ideas, methods and results in the study of the wind wave generation.

风浪相互作用的力学、经验和数值观点
风波相互作用的机械理论必须依赖于可验证的假设,并提供可重复的可观察的预测。几十年来,对这个问题的有限的机械把握推动了RANS和LES建模,并推动了大量的经验努力,根据风的标准统计特征(如风廓线、动能平衡或交换系数)的波浪诱导修改来描述相互作用。由于机械方法、经验方法和数值方法都与发生在同一介质中的同一现象有关,因此这里的一致性要求这些方法所依据的假设和它们产生的预测相互兼容,并得到测量结果的支持。理论分析和现场实验的最新发现促进了对波相干流的统计和动力模式的理解,这是风波交换机制描述的核心。这一进展促使人们重新审查以前的概念、努力和发现,以评价它们的适宜性、有效性和有用性。为此,本调查追溯了风浪产生研究的思想、方法和结果的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信