Female genital mutilation in northern upper Egypt: prospects reasons for performing and refusin

H. Hassan, Fatima Hosny Abd ELhakam, Momen Zakria, Rasha El Syed
{"title":"Female genital mutilation in northern upper Egypt: prospects reasons for performing and refusin","authors":"H. Hassan, Fatima Hosny Abd ELhakam, Momen Zakria, Rasha El Syed","doi":"10.15406/ncoaj.2023.09.00251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Female Genital Mutilation was reported during a papyrus from 163BC. Within the third century, Soranos who are taken into account as the father of obstetrics and gynecology described the procedure of FGM. Herodotus also pronounced the excision of female external genitalia in Egypt dated back to the primary century, Rome, Pre-Islamic Arabia, and therefore the Tsarist Russian Federation. Aim: The study was conducted to assess prospects reasons for performing and refusing female genital mutilation in Northern Upper Egypt. Subject & methods: A Descriptive Cross-sectional study was used to achieve the aim of the current study. The study was conducted in family health centers (FHCs) in different sitting at Beni-Suef Governorate. Convenient sample was used. A pre-designed structured questionnaire was used to collect data. The questionnaire is divided into two sections: (1) socio-demographic and personal characteristics; (2) Reasons for practicing FGM/C and reasons for refusing FGM. Results: The main reasons for performing FGM/C as mentioned; were traditions and culture, religious requirements, and to decrease the sexual desire of females (77.4%, 21.7 %, and 14.4%), respectively. The main reasons for refusing FGM/C were complications, not necessary, and problems between wife and husband (47.3%, 10.3%, and 9.4%), respectively. The main sources information about FGM/C were personal experience & friends or neighbors (71.3% & 36.2%), respectively. Conclusion: Traditions and culture was the main reason for performing FGM/C, followed by religious requirements, and to decrease the sexual desire of females. Health consequences of FGM/C were the main reason for refusing the procedure, followed by females who stated that FGM/C is not necessary, and problems caused between wife and husband related to FGM. Recommendations: Increase awareness about FGM/C law against all parties, whether parents seeking to perform FGM/C or health care workers or other persons participating in performing FGM/C.","PeriodicalId":437508,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Care Open Access Journal","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Care Open Access Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/ncoaj.2023.09.00251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Female Genital Mutilation was reported during a papyrus from 163BC. Within the third century, Soranos who are taken into account as the father of obstetrics and gynecology described the procedure of FGM. Herodotus also pronounced the excision of female external genitalia in Egypt dated back to the primary century, Rome, Pre-Islamic Arabia, and therefore the Tsarist Russian Federation. Aim: The study was conducted to assess prospects reasons for performing and refusing female genital mutilation in Northern Upper Egypt. Subject & methods: A Descriptive Cross-sectional study was used to achieve the aim of the current study. The study was conducted in family health centers (FHCs) in different sitting at Beni-Suef Governorate. Convenient sample was used. A pre-designed structured questionnaire was used to collect data. The questionnaire is divided into two sections: (1) socio-demographic and personal characteristics; (2) Reasons for practicing FGM/C and reasons for refusing FGM. Results: The main reasons for performing FGM/C as mentioned; were traditions and culture, religious requirements, and to decrease the sexual desire of females (77.4%, 21.7 %, and 14.4%), respectively. The main reasons for refusing FGM/C were complications, not necessary, and problems between wife and husband (47.3%, 10.3%, and 9.4%), respectively. The main sources information about FGM/C were personal experience & friends or neighbors (71.3% & 36.2%), respectively. Conclusion: Traditions and culture was the main reason for performing FGM/C, followed by religious requirements, and to decrease the sexual desire of females. Health consequences of FGM/C were the main reason for refusing the procedure, followed by females who stated that FGM/C is not necessary, and problems caused between wife and husband related to FGM. Recommendations: Increase awareness about FGM/C law against all parties, whether parents seeking to perform FGM/C or health care workers or other persons participating in performing FGM/C.
上埃及北部的女性生殖器切割:执行和拒绝的前景原因
背景:公元前163年的莎草纸上记载了女性生殖器切割。在第三世纪,被认为是产科和妇科之父的索拉诺人描述了女性生殖器切割的程序。希罗多德还宣称,埃及女性外生殖器的切除可以追溯到公元一世纪的罗马、伊斯兰教之前的阿拉伯,以及沙俄联邦。目的:该研究是为了评估在上埃及北部执行和拒绝切割女性生殖器官的前景原因。主题与方法:采用描述性横断面研究来达到本研究的目的。这项研究是在贝尼-苏韦夫省不同地区的家庭保健中心进行的。采用方便样品。使用预先设计的结构化问卷来收集数据。问卷分为两部分:(1)社会人口与个人特征;(二)实施割礼的理由和拒绝割礼的理由。结果:实施女性生殖器切割的主要原因如下;分别为传统文化、宗教要求和降低女性性欲(77.4%、21.7%和14.4%)。拒绝切割女性生殖器官的主要原因分别是并发症、不必要以及夫妻之间的问题(47.3%、10.3%和9.4%)。关于女性生殖器切割的主要信息来源是个人经历和朋友或邻居(分别为71.3%和36.2%)。结论:传统文化是实施女性生殖器切割的主要原因,其次是宗教要求,降低女性的性欲。切割女性生殖器官对健康的影响是拒绝该手术的主要原因,其次是女性认为没有必要切割女性生殖器官,以及妻子和丈夫之间因切割女性生殖器官而产生的问题。建议:提高各方对女性生殖器切割/切割法律的认识,无论是寻求实施女性生殖器切割的父母,还是卫生保健工作者或其他参与实施女性生殖器切割的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信