Second thoughts on Gedachtes Wohnen

M. T. Allen
{"title":"Second thoughts on Gedachtes Wohnen","authors":"M. T. Allen","doi":"10.1080/1090377042000285444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Troy Paddock’s paper recapitulates the well-known association of Martin Heidegger with National Socialism and further argues that this association extended to the Nazis’ racial imperialism. Surprisingly, Paddock does not include what is perhaps most pertinent to his point: namely, Heidegger’s inclusion in his 1953 publication of the Introduction to Metaphysics, and again in a Der Spiegel interview in the 1960s, of allusions to “the inner truth and greatness of this movement,” that is, National Socialism. The former would have come at the very time that Heidegger was writing the semi-mystical cultural anti-capitalist romanticism that is the core of the author’s discussion. The Introduction to Metaphysics appeared in German in 1953, though Heidegger had compiled most of it by 1935. “Bauen, Wohnen, Denken,” the essay which is central to the author’s argument, was delivered as a lecture in Darmstädt in 1952. Heidegger was, then, a more or less unrepentant “old Nazi” at the time he composed “Bauen, Wohnen, Denken.” The temptation to oversimplify the case is great, all the more so since Heidegger has achieved the status of guru among some who can brook no criticism of his holy name. However, it does no harm to point out, in Heidegger’s defense, that he also showed genuine anguish in his confrontation with National Socialism. There just never seems to have been enough to call true repentance, and there was certainly no repudiation. Any attempt, such as Paddock’s, to clarify the connections between Martin Heidegger and other thinkers in the ambit of the National Socialist intelligentsia should therefore be welcomed. Tying Heidegger to Nazi geographers like Friedrich Ratzel, the subject of this essay, would be a highly original contribution to intellectual history. On the other hand, to my lights, very little connects Heidegger to Ratzel’s geography other than a homology of thought or what is more or less a shared “notion.” Paddock might have added a bit of background on the community of geographers within which Ratzel worked. For example, Götz Aly and Suzanne Heim’s Vordenker der Vernichtung contains much information on influential German geographers like Walter Christaller, who influenced post-war geography as well as Nazi racial imperialism. Providing more than an apposition of Ratzel’s or any Nazi era geographers’ thought and","PeriodicalId":431617,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Geography","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy & Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1090377042000285444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Troy Paddock’s paper recapitulates the well-known association of Martin Heidegger with National Socialism and further argues that this association extended to the Nazis’ racial imperialism. Surprisingly, Paddock does not include what is perhaps most pertinent to his point: namely, Heidegger’s inclusion in his 1953 publication of the Introduction to Metaphysics, and again in a Der Spiegel interview in the 1960s, of allusions to “the inner truth and greatness of this movement,” that is, National Socialism. The former would have come at the very time that Heidegger was writing the semi-mystical cultural anti-capitalist romanticism that is the core of the author’s discussion. The Introduction to Metaphysics appeared in German in 1953, though Heidegger had compiled most of it by 1935. “Bauen, Wohnen, Denken,” the essay which is central to the author’s argument, was delivered as a lecture in Darmstädt in 1952. Heidegger was, then, a more or less unrepentant “old Nazi” at the time he composed “Bauen, Wohnen, Denken.” The temptation to oversimplify the case is great, all the more so since Heidegger has achieved the status of guru among some who can brook no criticism of his holy name. However, it does no harm to point out, in Heidegger’s defense, that he also showed genuine anguish in his confrontation with National Socialism. There just never seems to have been enough to call true repentance, and there was certainly no repudiation. Any attempt, such as Paddock’s, to clarify the connections between Martin Heidegger and other thinkers in the ambit of the National Socialist intelligentsia should therefore be welcomed. Tying Heidegger to Nazi geographers like Friedrich Ratzel, the subject of this essay, would be a highly original contribution to intellectual history. On the other hand, to my lights, very little connects Heidegger to Ratzel’s geography other than a homology of thought or what is more or less a shared “notion.” Paddock might have added a bit of background on the community of geographers within which Ratzel worked. For example, Götz Aly and Suzanne Heim’s Vordenker der Vernichtung contains much information on influential German geographers like Walter Christaller, who influenced post-war geography as well as Nazi racial imperialism. Providing more than an apposition of Ratzel’s or any Nazi era geographers’ thought and
对格达奇斯·沃恩的再次思考
特洛伊·帕多克(Troy Paddock)的论文概括了马丁·海德格尔(Martin Heidegger)与国家社会主义的著名联系,并进一步论证了这种联系延伸到了纳粹的种族帝国主义。令人惊讶的是,帕多克没有包括可能与他的观点最相关的内容:即,海德格尔在1953年出版的《形而上学导论》中,以及在20世纪60年代的《明镜周刊》采访中,都提到了“这个运动的内在真理和伟大”,即国家社会主义。前者可能出现在海德格尔写半神秘主义文化反资本主义浪漫主义的时候,这是作者讨论的核心。《形而上学导论》于1953年以德文版本出版,尽管海德格尔在1935年之前就已汇编了大部分内容。“Bauen Wohnen Denken”,这篇文章是作者的中心论点,是1952年在达姆施塔特的讲座。海德格尔在创作《Bauen, Wohnen, Denken》时,或多或少是一个顽固不化的“老纳粹”。简化情况下的诱惑是伟大的,更因为海德格尔一些谁能取得了大师的地位不容批评他的圣名。然而,在海德格尔的辩护中指出,他在与国家社会主义的对抗中也表现出了真正的痛苦,这并没有什么害处。似乎永远都不足以称之为真正的忏悔,当然也没有否定。因此,任何试图澄清马丁·海德格尔和其他国家社会主义知识界思想家之间联系的尝试,比如帕多克的尝试,都应该受到欢迎。将海德格尔与纳粹地理学家,如本文的主题弗里德里希·拉策尔(Friedrich Ratzel)联系起来,将是思想史上极具独创性的贡献。另一方面,在我看来,海德格尔和拉策尔的地理学几乎没有什么联系,除了思想的同源性或或多或少是一个共同的“概念”。帕多克可能会补充一点关于拉策尔工作的地理学家社区的背景。例如,Götz Aly和Suzanne Heim的《Vordenker der verichtung》包含了很多有影响力的德国地理学家的信息,比如Walter Christaller,他影响了战后地理学以及纳粹种族帝国主义。提供的不仅仅是拉策尔或任何纳粹时代地理学家的思想和对立
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信