Understanding Intellectual Property: About Moral Rights and Economic Effects

Alin Speriusi-Vlad
{"title":"Understanding Intellectual Property: About Moral Rights and Economic Effects","authors":"Alin Speriusi-Vlad","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2494901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Moral rights must be carefully studied by the business community, which could easily and wrongly believe that the intellectual property business involves only intellectual property economic rights. This is an introduction meant to reveal a contrasting legal and economic reality concerning the effects of the moral rights over the economic relations. Any unclear regulation must be interpreted in favour of the author, as they prevail over the interests of all other interested persons and, by consequence, any obligation assumed by the author or a contractor thereof, may be restricted, i.e. extended, by claiming that the author’s moral rights are violated or that they are not fully protected. Any kind of use of the protected creation involving the economic rights, is indissolubly connected to the work’s authorship claiming and, very often, with the work’s integrity compliance or withdrawal right. Any contract concluded between a person acquiring economic rights over an intangible asset, cannot deny or diminish author’s moral rights. The disclosure right is the decision of the author to put his work on the market, in contact with the public. After exhaustion, regardless the voluntary or the involuntary aspects, the disclosure right can no longer be breached, so that following disclosure of the intellectual property, any possible use of it without author’s consent violates only the economic rights and, possibly, other moral rights, such as the right to authorship of work and the right to withdraw the work, according to the concrete circumstances of the case. Conditioning the exhaustion of the disclosure right by a voluntary disclosure – whether there is the intent of disclosure on the part of the author or an ambiguous agreement – is wrong and inevitably leads to obstruction of commercial circuit.","PeriodicalId":237857,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Other Intellectual Property Law & Policy (Sub-Topic)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Innovation & Other Intellectual Property Law & Policy (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2494901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Moral rights must be carefully studied by the business community, which could easily and wrongly believe that the intellectual property business involves only intellectual property economic rights. This is an introduction meant to reveal a contrasting legal and economic reality concerning the effects of the moral rights over the economic relations. Any unclear regulation must be interpreted in favour of the author, as they prevail over the interests of all other interested persons and, by consequence, any obligation assumed by the author or a contractor thereof, may be restricted, i.e. extended, by claiming that the author’s moral rights are violated or that they are not fully protected. Any kind of use of the protected creation involving the economic rights, is indissolubly connected to the work’s authorship claiming and, very often, with the work’s integrity compliance or withdrawal right. Any contract concluded between a person acquiring economic rights over an intangible asset, cannot deny or diminish author’s moral rights. The disclosure right is the decision of the author to put his work on the market, in contact with the public. After exhaustion, regardless the voluntary or the involuntary aspects, the disclosure right can no longer be breached, so that following disclosure of the intellectual property, any possible use of it without author’s consent violates only the economic rights and, possibly, other moral rights, such as the right to authorship of work and the right to withdraw the work, according to the concrete circumstances of the case. Conditioning the exhaustion of the disclosure right by a voluntary disclosure – whether there is the intent of disclosure on the part of the author or an ambiguous agreement – is wrong and inevitably leads to obstruction of commercial circuit.
理解知识产权:关于精神权利与经济效应
企业界必须仔细研究精神权利,因为他们很容易错误地认为知识产权业务只涉及知识产权经济权利。这是一篇引言,旨在揭示道德权利对经济关系的影响的法律和经济现实的对比。任何不明确的规定都必须作出有利于作者的解释,因为它们优先于所有其他有关人员的利益,因此,作者或其承包商承担的任何义务都可能受到限制,即通过声称作者的精神权利受到侵犯或这些权利没有得到充分保护而加以扩大。任何涉及经济权利的对受保护作品的使用,都与作品的作者身份主张密不可分,而且往往与作品的完整性遵守或撤回权密切相关。取得无形资产经济权利的人订立的合同,不能否定或减损作者的精神权利。公开权是作者决定将其作品投放市场,与公众接触的权利。在穷尽之后,无论自愿还是非自愿,披露权都不能再被侵犯,因此,在知识产权披露之后,任何未经作者同意的使用都只侵犯了经济权利,也可能侵犯了其他精神权利,如作品的署名权和撤回权,具体视情况而定。以自愿披露来限制披露权的用尽——无论作者是否有披露的意图,还是有模棱两可的协议——都是错误的,不可避免地会导致商业巡回诉讼的阻碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信