Prevention of housing stock collapse in Ukraine requires extraordinary strategic decisions

V. Nikolaiev, O. Kucherenko
{"title":"Prevention of housing stock collapse in Ukraine requires extraordinary strategic decisions","authors":"V. Nikolaiev, O. Kucherenko","doi":"10.15396/eres2019_191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The whole housing stock in Ukraine is practically private. Social housing fund is almost absent. In the 1990s most of the flats in the multi-apartment buildings have been privatized by the tenants free of charge. About 80% of all buildings in the cities have been built up to 1980, are not yet repaired and require urgent modernization with the cost equal to the actual State budget revenue. By the law of 2015 the responsibility for carrying out capital repairs has been transferred to the flat owners who are co-owners of the buildings. Maintenance management is organized only on the level of separate houses (no-associations) and is unprofessional. The tariff for housing services is enormous low because the component of capital repairs traditionally has been excluded. In the worst homes live exactly the poorest families which do not have any means to maintain and repair their houses because one half of all families in the country receive subsidies to pay their utility bills. Taking into account other urgent and costly needs to maintain public infrastructure the State is also unable to accumulate sufficient funds to renovate the housing stock. At the same time there is a difficult question of the justice of additional state assistance to homeowners for repairing their assets at the expense of all taxpayers. Another question is how to operate this private property on the market. Governments of the country that often replace each other are afraid to raise this problem, which requires extraordinary decisions. It becomes obvious that homeowners are mostly inefficient but the idea of re-privatization can cause social rejection. There are no analogues in the history or in other post-Soviet countries, where either the condition of privatized houses was better, or household incomes were higher, or state aid was regular and where, due to the tariff, funds for capital repairs has been always accumulated and used.Unfortunately, in Ukraine there is no tradition of real estate professional management as a scientific branch, university specialization or profession. Our first attempts to find right decisions which will be described in the paper need approbation. Therefore, we want to draw attention of the best European real estate managers and researchers to the resolution of this problem.","PeriodicalId":152375,"journal":{"name":"26th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"26th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15396/eres2019_191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The whole housing stock in Ukraine is practically private. Social housing fund is almost absent. In the 1990s most of the flats in the multi-apartment buildings have been privatized by the tenants free of charge. About 80% of all buildings in the cities have been built up to 1980, are not yet repaired and require urgent modernization with the cost equal to the actual State budget revenue. By the law of 2015 the responsibility for carrying out capital repairs has been transferred to the flat owners who are co-owners of the buildings. Maintenance management is organized only on the level of separate houses (no-associations) and is unprofessional. The tariff for housing services is enormous low because the component of capital repairs traditionally has been excluded. In the worst homes live exactly the poorest families which do not have any means to maintain and repair their houses because one half of all families in the country receive subsidies to pay their utility bills. Taking into account other urgent and costly needs to maintain public infrastructure the State is also unable to accumulate sufficient funds to renovate the housing stock. At the same time there is a difficult question of the justice of additional state assistance to homeowners for repairing their assets at the expense of all taxpayers. Another question is how to operate this private property on the market. Governments of the country that often replace each other are afraid to raise this problem, which requires extraordinary decisions. It becomes obvious that homeowners are mostly inefficient but the idea of re-privatization can cause social rejection. There are no analogues in the history or in other post-Soviet countries, where either the condition of privatized houses was better, or household incomes were higher, or state aid was regular and where, due to the tariff, funds for capital repairs has been always accumulated and used.Unfortunately, in Ukraine there is no tradition of real estate professional management as a scientific branch, university specialization or profession. Our first attempts to find right decisions which will be described in the paper need approbation. Therefore, we want to draw attention of the best European real estate managers and researchers to the resolution of this problem.
防止乌克兰住房存量崩溃需要非同寻常的战略决策
乌克兰所有的住房存量几乎都是私人的。社会住房基金几乎不存在。在20世纪90年代,大多数公寓大楼的公寓都被租户免费私有化。城市中大约80%的建筑是在1980年之前建造的,尚未修复,急需现代化,其费用相当于国家实际预算收入。根据2015年的法律,进行基本维修的责任已转移到作为建筑物共同所有人的公寓业主身上。维修管理只在独立房屋(无协会)的水平上组织,不专业。住房服务的关税非常低,因为资本维修的组成部分传统上被排除在外。住在最糟糕的房子里的正是最贫穷的家庭,他们没有任何手段来维护和修理他们的房子,因为该国一半的家庭领取补贴来支付他们的水电费。考虑到维持公共基础设施的其他紧迫和昂贵的需要,国家也无法积累足够的资金来翻修住房存量。与此同时,还有一个棘手的问题,即政府以牺牲所有纳税人的利益为代价,为房主修复其资产提供额外援助是否公正。另一个问题是如何在市场上经营这些私有财产。经常相互替换的国家政府不敢提出这个问题,因为这需要特别的决定。很明显,房主大多效率低下,但再私有化的想法可能会引起社会的排斥。在历史上或其他后苏联国家中没有类似的情况,在这些国家中,私有化房屋的条件较好,或家庭收入较高,或国家援助经常,而且由于关税,资本维修的资金一直在积累和使用。不幸的是,乌克兰没有将房地产专业管理作为科学分支、大学专业或职业的传统。我们第一次尝试找到正确的决定,这将在论文中描述,需要批准。因此,我们希望引起欧洲最好的房地产管理者和研究人员对解决这一问题的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信