A Comparative Analysis of the Knowledge and Stigmatizing Attitude of Ghanaians and Nigerians towards COVID-19 Survivors

E. Lamptey, D. Serwaa, M. Antwi, Theckla Ikome, N. Odogwu
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of the Knowledge and Stigmatizing Attitude of Ghanaians and Nigerians towards COVID-19 Survivors","authors":"E. Lamptey, D. Serwaa, M. Antwi, Theckla Ikome, N. Odogwu","doi":"10.55504/2473-0327.1080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In Africa, COVID-19 associated stigmatization still remains the contextual fac- tor that poses a challenge for the mitigation and suppression of COVID-19 spread, especially among the illiterate populations. This comparative study was therefore conducted to assess the knowledge and willingness of Ghanaians and Nigerians to associate with COVID-19 survivors. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to collect information from 290 Ghanaian and 220 Nigerian nationals aged 18 years and above between 11th July-30th October 2020. An electronic-based questionnaire was developed to collect information on the public. The data were analyzed with SPSS v 22 and factors influencing knowledge and willingness to associate with COVID-19 survivors were identified using chi-square and logistic regression at p=0.05. Results: The mean age of all participants was 26.18(SD=6.87), about 75% of the Ghanaians and 81.8% of Nigerians were within 25-34 years of age. . Ghanaians were more knowledgeable about COVID-19, 230(79.3%) compared with Nigerians 60(27.3%). High stigmatizing attitude was dominant among Nigerians 140(73.7) than Ghanaian 50 (26.3). While age significantly in-creased knowledge [OR: 2.83(1.461,5.495), p=0.002] and deceased stigmatizing attitude [OR: 0.35(0.182,0.684), p=0.002] in Ghana, it wasn’t significant in Nigeria. In both countries, religious affiliation and education were not statistically associated with knowledge and stigmatizing attitude. Conclusions: The overall knowledge and willingness to associate with COVID-19 survivors among these study participants were fairly adequate and welcoming for the integration of COV-ID-19 survivors into normal living. Stakeholders should embark on COVID-19 stigmatization campaigns through a timely online update, van mobilization and mass media broadcasting aimed at stopping and preventing further stigma surrounding infected and recovered persons.","PeriodicalId":198307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Refugee & Global Health","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Refugee & Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55504/2473-0327.1080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: In Africa, COVID-19 associated stigmatization still remains the contextual fac- tor that poses a challenge for the mitigation and suppression of COVID-19 spread, especially among the illiterate populations. This comparative study was therefore conducted to assess the knowledge and willingness of Ghanaians and Nigerians to associate with COVID-19 survivors. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to collect information from 290 Ghanaian and 220 Nigerian nationals aged 18 years and above between 11th July-30th October 2020. An electronic-based questionnaire was developed to collect information on the public. The data were analyzed with SPSS v 22 and factors influencing knowledge and willingness to associate with COVID-19 survivors were identified using chi-square and logistic regression at p=0.05. Results: The mean age of all participants was 26.18(SD=6.87), about 75% of the Ghanaians and 81.8% of Nigerians were within 25-34 years of age. . Ghanaians were more knowledgeable about COVID-19, 230(79.3%) compared with Nigerians 60(27.3%). High stigmatizing attitude was dominant among Nigerians 140(73.7) than Ghanaian 50 (26.3). While age significantly in-creased knowledge [OR: 2.83(1.461,5.495), p=0.002] and deceased stigmatizing attitude [OR: 0.35(0.182,0.684), p=0.002] in Ghana, it wasn’t significant in Nigeria. In both countries, religious affiliation and education were not statistically associated with knowledge and stigmatizing attitude. Conclusions: The overall knowledge and willingness to associate with COVID-19 survivors among these study participants were fairly adequate and welcoming for the integration of COV-ID-19 survivors into normal living. Stakeholders should embark on COVID-19 stigmatization campaigns through a timely online update, van mobilization and mass media broadcasting aimed at stopping and preventing further stigma surrounding infected and recovered persons.
加纳人和尼日利亚人对COVID-19幸存者的认知和污名化态度比较分析
导言:在非洲,与COVID-19相关的污名化仍然是一个背景因素,对缓解和抑制COVID-19的传播构成挑战,特别是在文盲人群中。因此,进行这项比较研究是为了评估加纳人和尼日利亚人与COVID-19幸存者交往的知识和意愿。方法:通过横断面研究收集了2020年7月11日至10月30日期间年龄在18岁及以上的290名加纳人和220名尼日利亚人的信息。编制了一份电子问卷,以收集有关公众的资料。采用SPSS v 22对数据进行分析,采用卡方回归和logistic回归(p=0.05)确定影响与COVID-19幸存者相关知识和意愿的因素。结果:所有参与者的平均年龄为26.18岁(SD=6.87),约75%的加纳人、81.8%的尼日利亚人年龄在25-34岁之间。加纳人对新冠肺炎的了解程度为230人(79.3%),尼日利亚人为60人(27.3%)。高度污名化的态度在尼日利亚(140名,73.7名)比加纳(50名,26.3名)多。年龄在加纳显著影响知识[OR: 2.83(1.461,5.495), p=0.002]和死者污名化态度[OR: 0.35(0.182,0.684), p=0.002],而在尼日利亚无显著影响。在这两个国家,宗教信仰和受教育程度与知识和污名化态度没有统计上的联系。结论:在这些研究参与者中,与COVID-19幸存者联系的总体知识和意愿相当充分,并且欢迎COVID-19幸存者融入正常生活。利益攸关方应通过及时的在线更新、面包车动员和大众媒体广播开展COVID-19污名化运动,旨在制止和防止对感染者和康复者的进一步污名化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信