Carbon Trading: Solution or Chimera

L. Coleman
{"title":"Carbon Trading: Solution or Chimera","authors":"L. Coleman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.997948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article responds to growing interest in carbon emissions trading to reduce the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. It identifies the objectives and performance criteria of a price mechanism to regulate global emissions, and then compares the two most commonly proposed solutions, which are a carbon tax and emissions trading. The analysis concludes the more efficient policy is to set emission limits for each country, and then extend existing excise systems to impose a tax on carbon consumption that achieves the emissions target. An international trading scheme is simply too complex, too expensive because of the new infrastructure required to handle emission permits, and too risky because of inevitable weaknesses in emissions markets.","PeriodicalId":239784,"journal":{"name":"EIB: Environmental Impacts Related to Management (Topic)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIB: Environmental Impacts Related to Management (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.997948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This article responds to growing interest in carbon emissions trading to reduce the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. It identifies the objectives and performance criteria of a price mechanism to regulate global emissions, and then compares the two most commonly proposed solutions, which are a carbon tax and emissions trading. The analysis concludes the more efficient policy is to set emission limits for each country, and then extend existing excise systems to impose a tax on carbon consumption that achieves the emissions target. An international trading scheme is simply too complex, too expensive because of the new infrastructure required to handle emission permits, and too risky because of inevitable weaknesses in emissions markets.
碳交易:解决方案还是幻想
本文回应了人们对碳排放交易日益增长的兴趣,以减少大气中温室气体的浓度。它确定了控制全球排放的价格机制的目标和绩效标准,然后比较了两种最常见的解决方案,即碳税和排放交易。分析得出的结论是,更有效的政策是为每个国家设定排放限制,然后扩大现有的消费税制度,对达到排放目标的碳消费征税。国际交易计划太复杂,太昂贵,因为处理排放许可需要新的基础设施,而且风险太大,因为排放市场不可避免地存在弱点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信