La ricezione di Maria Montessori da parte di Giuseppe Lombardo-Radice e degli intellettuali idealisti

A. Lupi
{"title":"La ricezione di Maria Montessori da parte di Giuseppe Lombardo-Radice e degli intellettuali idealisti","authors":"A. Lupi","doi":"10.6092/ISSN.1970-2221/12320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Italian historiographical tradition on the reception of Maria Montessori has highlighted the widespread misunderstanding that she faced in Italy, often accompanied by prejudicial devaluation, if not by actual personal attacks. Within this critical panorama, stronger resistance was exhibited by Catholics and Neo-Kantians than by Idealists, and in particular Gentile and Lombardo-Radice showed deep appreciation for Montessori, offering her remarks that were rather interesting from a pedagogical standpoint – and are still to be considered thoroughly if we wish to approach her method critically. Furthermore, Lombardo-Radice also brought into the Italian debate a series of international criticisms that had the same tone and content as those addressed to her by the intellectuals involved in the new school movement, as evidenced by an analysis of the articles that Ferriere published in the magazine Pour l’Ere Nouvelleduring the 1920s. By doing so Lombardo-Radice confirmed his divergence from Gentile and his proximity to the progressive school movement.","PeriodicalId":366273,"journal":{"name":"Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica. Journal of Theories and Research in Education","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica. Journal of Theories and Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1970-2221/12320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Italian historiographical tradition on the reception of Maria Montessori has highlighted the widespread misunderstanding that she faced in Italy, often accompanied by prejudicial devaluation, if not by actual personal attacks. Within this critical panorama, stronger resistance was exhibited by Catholics and Neo-Kantians than by Idealists, and in particular Gentile and Lombardo-Radice showed deep appreciation for Montessori, offering her remarks that were rather interesting from a pedagogical standpoint – and are still to be considered thoroughly if we wish to approach her method critically. Furthermore, Lombardo-Radice also brought into the Italian debate a series of international criticisms that had the same tone and content as those addressed to her by the intellectuals involved in the new school movement, as evidenced by an analysis of the articles that Ferriere published in the magazine Pour l’Ere Nouvelleduring the 1920s. By doing so Lombardo-Radice confirmed his divergence from Gentile and his proximity to the progressive school movement.
朱塞佩·伦巴多-拉蒂和理想主义知识分子对玛丽亚·蒙特梭利的接待
意大利对玛丽亚·蒙台梭利的历史传统强调了她在意大利面临的广泛误解,通常伴随着偏见的贬低,如果不是实际的人身攻击。在这个批判的全貌中,天主教徒和新康德主义者比理想主义者表现出更强的抵抗,特别是外邦人和伦巴多-拉迪斯对蒙台梭利表现出深深的感激,从教学的角度来看,她的评论相当有趣——如果我们希望批判性地接近她的方法,这些评论仍然需要彻底考虑。此外,Lombardo-Radice还为意大利的辩论带来了一系列国际批评,这些批评的语气和内容与参与新学派运动的知识分子对她提出的批评相同,正如对费里埃在20世纪20年代发表在《Pour l’ere nouvelle》杂志上的文章的分析所证明的那样。通过这样做,隆巴多-拉迪斯证实了他与外邦人的分歧,以及他与进步学派运动的接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信