Foreigner-directed speech is simpler than native-directed: Evidence from social media

Aleksandrs Berdicevskis
{"title":"Foreigner-directed speech is simpler than native-directed: Evidence from social media","authors":"Aleksandrs Berdicevskis","doi":"10.18653/v1/2020.nlpcss-1.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I test two hypotheses that play an important role in modern sociolinguistics and language evolution studies: first, that non-native production is simpler than native; second, that production addressed to non-native speakers is simpler than that addressed to natives. The second hypothesis is particularly important for theories about contact-induced simplification, since the accommodation to non-natives may explain how the simplification can spread from adult learners to the whole community. To test the hypotheses, I create a very large corpus of native and non-native written speech in four languages (English, French, Italian, Spanish), extracting data from an internet forum where native languages of the participants are known and the structure of the interactions can be inferred. The corpus data yield inconsistent evidence with respect to the first hypothesis, but largely support the second one, suggesting that foreigner-directed speech is indeed simpler than native-directed. Importantly, when testing the first hypothesis, I contrast production of different speakers, which can introduce confounds and is a likely reason for the inconsistencies. When testing the second hypothesis, the comparison is always within the production of the same speaker (but with different addressees), which makes it more reliable.","PeriodicalId":398724,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.nlpcss-1.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

I test two hypotheses that play an important role in modern sociolinguistics and language evolution studies: first, that non-native production is simpler than native; second, that production addressed to non-native speakers is simpler than that addressed to natives. The second hypothesis is particularly important for theories about contact-induced simplification, since the accommodation to non-natives may explain how the simplification can spread from adult learners to the whole community. To test the hypotheses, I create a very large corpus of native and non-native written speech in four languages (English, French, Italian, Spanish), extracting data from an internet forum where native languages of the participants are known and the structure of the interactions can be inferred. The corpus data yield inconsistent evidence with respect to the first hypothesis, but largely support the second one, suggesting that foreigner-directed speech is indeed simpler than native-directed. Importantly, when testing the first hypothesis, I contrast production of different speakers, which can introduce confounds and is a likely reason for the inconsistencies. When testing the second hypothesis, the comparison is always within the production of the same speaker (but with different addressees), which makes it more reliable.
来自社交媒体的证据表明,外国人导向语比母语导向语更简单
我检验了两个在现代社会语言学和语言进化研究中发挥重要作用的假设:第一,非母语语言的产生比母语语言简单;其次,针对非母语人士的制作比针对母语人士的制作更简单。第二个假设对于接触诱发的简化理论尤其重要,因为对非本地人的适应可能解释了简化如何从成人学习者传播到整个社区。为了验证这些假设,我创建了一个非常大的语料库,包含四种语言(英语、法语、意大利语、西班牙语)的母语和非母语书面演讲,从一个已知参与者母语的互联网论坛中提取数据,并推断出互动的结构。语料库数据对第一种假设提供了不一致的证据,但在很大程度上支持第二种假设,表明外国人导向的言语确实比母语导向的更简单。重要的是,在测试第一个假设时,我对比了不同说话者的产出,这可能会带来混淆,也可能是不一致的原因。当测试第二个假设时,比较总是在同一说话者(但不同的收信人)的生产范围内,这使得它更可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信