Whose Park? The forty-year fight for Folkets Park under Copenhagen’s evolving urban managerialism

R. Rutt, S. Loveless
{"title":"Whose Park? The forty-year fight for Folkets Park under Copenhagen’s evolving urban managerialism","authors":"R. Rutt, S. Loveless","doi":"10.3351/PPP.2018.6224795825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper interrogates the evolution of struggles over a park in Copenhagen, Denmark. This evolution is situated between local residents’ efforts to obtain socioenvironmental justice, and attempts to manage the space by municipal authorities for different agendas. Analytically bringing the concepts of environmental justice and urban managerialism into focus and drawing from lessons and stories of the past, we show how managerial practices and justice struggles evolve iteratively over time. We document how the beginnings of Folkets Park (the People’s Park) in the late 1970s were characterized by struggles over distributional justice between economically marginalized residents and urban managers. The conflicts changed to contestation over procedural and interactive justice, due to the formalization of the park and expanding struggles for recognition and claims to the space by a diversifying population. Trends of decentralization to municipal levels and greater inclusivity have also taken root, maintaining urban managers as distributors of justice. Yet, we demonstrate that urban managers do not act in isolation. Local activists are an important force in urban development, producing an iterative evolution of strategies of management and justice struggles in this neighbourhood. Urban managerialism in Copenhagen, including the more contemporary efforts at inclusion, is also (re)shaped, inhibited, and co-opted by the larger context of increasingly neoliberal and socially divisive political agendas. By examining this micro-cosmos of a contested urban park, we show that urban planning and development is an inherently political and contested practice, and argue for urban managers to continuously seek inspiration from local activism in the pursuit of just cities of today and tomorrow.","PeriodicalId":162475,"journal":{"name":"People, Place and Policy Online","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"People, Place and Policy Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3351/PPP.2018.6224795825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper interrogates the evolution of struggles over a park in Copenhagen, Denmark. This evolution is situated between local residents’ efforts to obtain socioenvironmental justice, and attempts to manage the space by municipal authorities for different agendas. Analytically bringing the concepts of environmental justice and urban managerialism into focus and drawing from lessons and stories of the past, we show how managerial practices and justice struggles evolve iteratively over time. We document how the beginnings of Folkets Park (the People’s Park) in the late 1970s were characterized by struggles over distributional justice between economically marginalized residents and urban managers. The conflicts changed to contestation over procedural and interactive justice, due to the formalization of the park and expanding struggles for recognition and claims to the space by a diversifying population. Trends of decentralization to municipal levels and greater inclusivity have also taken root, maintaining urban managers as distributors of justice. Yet, we demonstrate that urban managers do not act in isolation. Local activists are an important force in urban development, producing an iterative evolution of strategies of management and justice struggles in this neighbourhood. Urban managerialism in Copenhagen, including the more contemporary efforts at inclusion, is also (re)shaped, inhibited, and co-opted by the larger context of increasingly neoliberal and socially divisive political agendas. By examining this micro-cosmos of a contested urban park, we show that urban planning and development is an inherently political and contested practice, and argue for urban managers to continuously seek inspiration from local activism in the pursuit of just cities of today and tomorrow.
的公园吗?在哥本哈根不断发展的城市管理主义下,为福尔克茨公园而战的四十年
本文探讨了丹麦哥本哈根一座公园的演变过程。这种演变介于当地居民争取社会环境正义的努力和市政当局为不同议程管理空间的尝试之间。通过分析,将环境正义和城市管理主义的概念纳入重点,并从过去的经验教训和故事中汲取教训,我们展示了管理实践和正义斗争如何随着时间的推移而迭代发展。我们记录了20世纪70年代末Folkets公园(人民公园)的开始是如何以经济边缘化居民和城市管理者之间的分配正义斗争为特征的。由于公园的形式化和多样化人口对空间的认可和要求的不断扩大的斗争,冲突转变为对程序和互动正义的争论。分权到市级和更大包容性的趋势也已经扎根,使城市管理者成为正义的分发者。然而,我们证明城市管理者并非孤立行动。当地活动家是城市发展的重要力量,在这个社区产生了管理和正义斗争战略的迭代演变。哥本哈根的城市管理主义,包括更现代的包容性努力,也被日益增长的新自由主义和社会分裂的政治议程的更大背景(重新)塑造、抑制和吸收。通过研究这个有争议的城市公园的微观世界,我们展示了城市规划和发展本质上是一种政治和有争议的实践,并主张城市管理者在追求今天和明天的城市公正的过程中,不断从当地的激进主义中寻求灵感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信