{"title":"Demokrasi Sebagai Diskursus dan Deliberasi Menurut Jűrgen Habermas","authors":"Paulus Pati Lewar, Otto Gusti Ndegong Madung","doi":"10.31385/jl.v21i2.315.150-161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This article attempts to reconstruct and analyse the Habermas’ view on democracy as discourse and deliberation. The concept of deliberative and discursive democracy is a model of criticism toward an attempt to narrow the conception about democracy simply as an institutional matter. The concept of deliberative democracy emphasizes the importance of public discursive participation of citizens by establishing critical public sphere that is the heart of democracy. Furthermore, Habermas highlights that there is no rule of law without radical democracy. Such radical democracy is expressed through the active involvement of citizens in public sphere to express ideas that have impact on political decisions and public policy. This article accentuates that the transformation of public opinion to be a political power is an ongoing process. Therefore, an authentic democracy presupposes a critical publicity and democratic political culture. Without a voluntary citizens’ initiative in this regard, a state will have no future. To support thisarguments, the writer uses literature research method by analyzing the main work of Jȕrgen Habermas on deliberative democracy namely Faktizitӓt und Geltung (Facts and Norms), as well as some secondary literatures dealing with the thoughts of Habermas on democracy.Keywords: Habermas, deliberative democracy, discourse, pluralism, state","PeriodicalId":338978,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ledalero","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ledalero","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31385/jl.v21i2.315.150-161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: This article attempts to reconstruct and analyse the Habermas’ view on democracy as discourse and deliberation. The concept of deliberative and discursive democracy is a model of criticism toward an attempt to narrow the conception about democracy simply as an institutional matter. The concept of deliberative democracy emphasizes the importance of public discursive participation of citizens by establishing critical public sphere that is the heart of democracy. Furthermore, Habermas highlights that there is no rule of law without radical democracy. Such radical democracy is expressed through the active involvement of citizens in public sphere to express ideas that have impact on political decisions and public policy. This article accentuates that the transformation of public opinion to be a political power is an ongoing process. Therefore, an authentic democracy presupposes a critical publicity and democratic political culture. Without a voluntary citizens’ initiative in this regard, a state will have no future. To support thisarguments, the writer uses literature research method by analyzing the main work of Jȕrgen Habermas on deliberative democracy namely Faktizitӓt und Geltung (Facts and Norms), as well as some secondary literatures dealing with the thoughts of Habermas on democracy.Keywords: Habermas, deliberative democracy, discourse, pluralism, state
摘要:本文试图重构和分析哈贝马斯关于民主作为话语和审议的观点。协商民主和话语民主的概念是一种批判模式,它试图将民主的概念缩小为一种制度问题。协商民主的概念通过建立作为民主核心的批判性公共领域来强调公民公共话语参与的重要性。此外,哈贝马斯强调,没有激进的民主就没有法治。这种激进的民主是通过公民在公共领域的积极参与来表达对政治决策和公共政策有影响的想法来表达的。本文强调舆论向政治力量的转化是一个持续的过程。因此,真正的民主以批判的公开和民主的政治文化为前提。没有公民在这方面的自愿倡议,一个国家就没有未来。为了支持这一论点,笔者采用文献研究法,分析了Jȕrgen哈贝马斯关于协商民主的主要著作《事实与规范》(Faktizitӓt und Geltung),以及一些涉及哈贝马斯关于民主思想的二手文献。关键词:哈贝马斯,协商民主,话语,多元化,国家