Existential Limits

David Mcpherson
{"title":"Existential Limits","authors":"David Mcpherson","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192848536.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In exploring the place of limits within a well-lived human life, this first chapter begins at the most general level with “existential limits,” which are limits with respect to the given, that is, to what exists. This chapter explores two fundamental existential stances, or orientations toward the given, which play a key role throughout the book. One stance is the choosing-controlling stance. All mature human beings adopt this stance to some extent in their efforts to improve their lives and the world around them through controlling, transforming, and overcoming the given. However, at the extreme, this stance can give expression to a “Promethean” project of “playing God” by seeking mastery over the given. The other basic existential stance is at odds with this Promethean project: it is referred to as the accepting-appreciating stance. By accepting and appreciating the given, this stance imposes limits on the choosing-controlling stance. While acknowledging an important role for a choosing-controlling stance in human life, this chapter argues that the accepting-appreciating stance toward the given should be regarded as primary in several ways and discusses specific limiting virtues—namely, humility, reverence, contentment, and loyalty—that give proper expression to this stance. This chapter begins with a discussion of prominent defenses of the Promethean project of mastery in the works of Friedrich Nietzsche and, more recently, Ronald Dworkin in his argument in favor of genetic engineering, and then it turns to make the case against the Promethean project.","PeriodicalId":316083,"journal":{"name":"The Virtues of Limits","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Virtues of Limits","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192848536.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In exploring the place of limits within a well-lived human life, this first chapter begins at the most general level with “existential limits,” which are limits with respect to the given, that is, to what exists. This chapter explores two fundamental existential stances, or orientations toward the given, which play a key role throughout the book. One stance is the choosing-controlling stance. All mature human beings adopt this stance to some extent in their efforts to improve their lives and the world around them through controlling, transforming, and overcoming the given. However, at the extreme, this stance can give expression to a “Promethean” project of “playing God” by seeking mastery over the given. The other basic existential stance is at odds with this Promethean project: it is referred to as the accepting-appreciating stance. By accepting and appreciating the given, this stance imposes limits on the choosing-controlling stance. While acknowledging an important role for a choosing-controlling stance in human life, this chapter argues that the accepting-appreciating stance toward the given should be regarded as primary in several ways and discusses specific limiting virtues—namely, humility, reverence, contentment, and loyalty—that give proper expression to this stance. This chapter begins with a discussion of prominent defenses of the Promethean project of mastery in the works of Friedrich Nietzsche and, more recently, Ronald Dworkin in his argument in favor of genetic engineering, and then it turns to make the case against the Promethean project.
存在限制
在探索人类美好生活中的限制的位置时,第一章从最一般的层面开始,“存在的限制”,这是关于给定的限制,也就是存在的限制。本章探讨了两种基本的存在立场,或对给定的方向,这在全书中起着关键作用。一种姿态是选择控制姿态。所有成熟的人都在某种程度上采取这种立场,通过控制、改造和克服既定的事物来努力改善他们的生活和周围的世界。然而,在极端情况下,这种立场可以通过寻求对给定事物的掌握来表达“扮演上帝”的“普罗米修斯”计划。另一个基本的存在主义立场与这个普罗米修斯计划不一致:它被称为接受-欣赏立场。这种立场通过接受和欣赏给定的东西,对选择控制立场施加了限制。在承认选择-控制立场在人类生活中的重要作用的同时,本章认为,对给定的接受-欣赏立场应该在几个方面被视为主要的,并讨论了具体的限制美德,即谦卑,敬畏,满足和忠诚,这些美德适当地表达了这一立场。这一章首先讨论弗里德里希·尼采的著作中对普罗米修斯计划的杰出辩护,以及最近罗纳德·德沃金对基因工程的支持,然后转到反对普罗米修斯计划的案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信