New Rules, New Players? The ECI as a Source of Competition and Contention in the European Public Sphere

Luis Garcia
{"title":"New Rules, New Players? The ECI as a Source of Competition and Contention in the European Public Sphere","authors":"Luis Garcia","doi":"10.1080/15705854.2012.702577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article analyses the potential effect of the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) on the field of relations between European institutions and civil society organisations (CSOs). The article builds on empirical analysis of data coming from almost a decade of debate about participatory democracy in the EU, and in particular, evidence from the consultation on the Green Paper about the ECI (European Commission, 2009) and 21 signature-collection campaigns that have been launched so far (Fischer & Lichtbau, 2008; Kaufmann, 2010) in order to foresee the attitudes of these organisations towards the initiative. Analysis of the campaigns launched so far suggests the existence of four categories of promoters. The first two are easily expected, that is, EU organisations working closely with members to launch campaigns and large organisations promoting campaigns on visible topics. Additionally, it seems that the ECI may be used in connection to organisations' commercial interests and that political actors (MPs, MEPs and regional and local authorities) may be important drivers. The article finds no evidence of a significant bias of ECIs towards social movements and national organisations but rather towards EU groups able to play the institutional and the protest game. It finds evidence as well that the promoters of ECIs are evenly divided between organisations wanting to protest against the course of European integration and those wanting to influence its course.","PeriodicalId":186367,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on European Politics and Society","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on European Politics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2012.702577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Abstract This article analyses the potential effect of the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) on the field of relations between European institutions and civil society organisations (CSOs). The article builds on empirical analysis of data coming from almost a decade of debate about participatory democracy in the EU, and in particular, evidence from the consultation on the Green Paper about the ECI (European Commission, 2009) and 21 signature-collection campaigns that have been launched so far (Fischer & Lichtbau, 2008; Kaufmann, 2010) in order to foresee the attitudes of these organisations towards the initiative. Analysis of the campaigns launched so far suggests the existence of four categories of promoters. The first two are easily expected, that is, EU organisations working closely with members to launch campaigns and large organisations promoting campaigns on visible topics. Additionally, it seems that the ECI may be used in connection to organisations' commercial interests and that political actors (MPs, MEPs and regional and local authorities) may be important drivers. The article finds no evidence of a significant bias of ECIs towards social movements and national organisations but rather towards EU groups able to play the institutional and the protest game. It finds evidence as well that the promoters of ECIs are evenly divided between organisations wanting to protest against the course of European integration and those wanting to influence its course.
新规则,新玩家?ECI作为欧洲公共领域竞争和争论的源泉
摘要本文分析了欧洲公民倡议(ECI)对欧洲机构与公民社会组织(cso)关系领域的潜在影响。本文基于对近十年来关于欧盟参与式民主的辩论数据的实证分析,特别是关于ECI绿皮书的磋商证据(欧盟委员会,2009年)和迄今为止发起的21项签名收集运动(Fischer & Lichtbau, 2008年;考夫曼,2010),以预见这些组织对倡议的态度。对迄今发起的活动的分析表明,存在四类促进者。前两种情况很容易预料,即欧盟组织与成员国密切合作发起活动,以及大型组织就可见主题开展活动。此外,ECI似乎可能与组织的商业利益有关,政治行为者(国会议员、欧洲议会议员和地区和地方当局)可能是重要的驱动因素。这篇文章没有发现证据表明欧洲经济共同体对社会运动和国家组织有明显的偏见,而是对能够玩制度和抗议游戏的欧盟组织有明显的偏见。报告还发现证据表明,eci的推动者分为两派,一派希望抗议欧洲一体化进程,另一派希望影响其进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信