‘Why Do We Still Sift the Husk-Like Upaniṣads?’

Rembert Lutjeharms
{"title":"‘Why Do We Still Sift the Husk-Like Upaniṣads?’","authors":"Rembert Lutjeharms","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780199478866.003.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Examining the Padyāvalī of the preeminent Gaudiya theologian Rupa Gosvami, Lutjeharms examines how Rupa creatively arranges both religious and non-religious verses by numerous poets into a dissertation that evinces intimate familiarity with Vedanta (particularly Advaita Vedanta), but ultimately establishes bhakti as being superior to Vedanta’s primary object, liberation. Redrawing the lines between Vedanta and Vaishnavism also affords Rupa the opportunity to distinguish Chaitanyaite theology from that of other Vaishnava sects like the Sri Vaishnava Sampraday, which had also wrestled with Vedanta in its own theological literature.","PeriodicalId":417009,"journal":{"name":"Text and Tradition in Early Modern North India","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Text and Tradition in Early Modern North India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780199478866.003.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Examining the Padyāvalī of the preeminent Gaudiya theologian Rupa Gosvami, Lutjeharms examines how Rupa creatively arranges both religious and non-religious verses by numerous poets into a dissertation that evinces intimate familiarity with Vedanta (particularly Advaita Vedanta), but ultimately establishes bhakti as being superior to Vedanta’s primary object, liberation. Redrawing the lines between Vedanta and Vaishnavism also affords Rupa the opportunity to distinguish Chaitanyaite theology from that of other Vaishnava sects like the Sri Vaishnava Sampraday, which had also wrestled with Vedanta in its own theological literature.
“为什么我们仍然筛壳样Upaniṣads?””
Lutjeharms考察了杰出的高迪雅神学家Rupa Gosvami的Padyāvalī,研究了Rupa如何创造性地将众多诗人的宗教和非宗教诗句安排到一篇论文中,这表明他对吠檀多(尤其是Advaita吠檀多)非常熟悉,但最终确立了巴克提优于吠檀多的主要目标——解放。重新划定吠檀多和毗湿奴主义之间的界限,也为鲁帕提供了机会,将柴塔尼派神学与其他毗湿奴教派(如Sri Vaishnava Sampraday)区分开来,后者也在自己的神学文献中与吠檀多进行了斗争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信