Comparative analysis of the Light-CNN and FaceNet methods for identifying and maintaining human faces

Huang Yea-Shuan, Mahmood Alhlffee
{"title":"Comparative analysis of the Light-CNN and FaceNet methods for identifying and maintaining human faces","authors":"Huang Yea-Shuan, Mahmood Alhlffee","doi":"10.1145/3571560.3571575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maintaining the identity while synthesizing the frontal view image is the most critical step in developing a \"recognition via generation\" framework. To this end, this paper investigates, tests and compares the performance of two deep learning architectures: Light-CNN and FaceNet. The Light-CNN is used to learn a robust feature for face verification tasks that produces a high-level facial identity accuracy over many traditional deep learning models. FaceNet, on the other hand, is a model to maps face images into a compact Euclidean space where distances directly represent a measure of face similarity. In our comparison, we use the TP-GAN model to perform several pre-processing stages. The face features are then extracted from the synthesized face images using Light-CNN and FaceNet as 256- and 128-dimensional representations, respectively. We evaluate the accuracy performances of Light-CNN and FaceNet architectures on Multi-PIE and FEI datasets.","PeriodicalId":143909,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3571560.3571575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maintaining the identity while synthesizing the frontal view image is the most critical step in developing a "recognition via generation" framework. To this end, this paper investigates, tests and compares the performance of two deep learning architectures: Light-CNN and FaceNet. The Light-CNN is used to learn a robust feature for face verification tasks that produces a high-level facial identity accuracy over many traditional deep learning models. FaceNet, on the other hand, is a model to maps face images into a compact Euclidean space where distances directly represent a measure of face similarity. In our comparison, we use the TP-GAN model to perform several pre-processing stages. The face features are then extracted from the synthesized face images using Light-CNN and FaceNet as 256- and 128-dimensional representations, respectively. We evaluate the accuracy performances of Light-CNN and FaceNet architectures on Multi-PIE and FEI datasets.
Light-CNN与FaceNet人脸识别与维护方法的对比分析
在合成正面视图图像的同时保持身份是建立“生成识别”框架的最关键步骤。为此,本文调查、测试和比较了两种深度学习架构:Light-CNN和FaceNet的性能。Light-CNN用于学习人脸验证任务的鲁棒特征,该特征比许多传统深度学习模型产生更高的人脸识别精度。另一方面,FaceNet是一个将人脸图像映射到紧凑的欧几里得空间的模型,其中距离直接表示人脸相似性的度量。在我们的比较中,我们使用TP-GAN模型执行几个预处理阶段。然后使用Light-CNN和FaceNet分别作为256维和128维表示从合成的人脸图像中提取人脸特征。我们评估了Light-CNN和FaceNet架构在Multi-PIE和FEI数据集上的精度性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信