Exploring the production of climate change through the nomosphere of the fossil fuel regime

L. Rickards, C. Jolley
{"title":"Exploring the production of climate change through the nomosphere of the fossil fuel regime","authors":"L. Rickards, C. Jolley","doi":"10.4324/9780429426308-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Addressing climate change demands a reconfiguration of often taken-for-granted social relations, especially with respect to the power structures undergirding our energy systems and the associated extraction and accumulation regimes. Social science on the extractive industries and energy sector has burgeoned over the last decade. Much of this research, notably that informed by Marxist analyses, points to the large, entangled structural forces in play, forces that reveal how entwined the mining and energy sectors are with other sectors, including the public sector (e.g. Baer 2016). Other research focuses on particular cases and groups of decision-makers (e.g. Snell 2018), including local groups involved in, for example, contesting a new coal mine or establishing a new renewable energy project by negotiating externally imposed legal requirements and policy settings (e.g. Moffatt and Baker 2013). While both of these areas of research that on broad-scale structures and that on local cases are important, they tend to leave intact a major blind spot: the everyday social processes, practices, dynamics and systems, and the individuals and local interpersonal interactions, which imagined high-level structures actually consist of.","PeriodicalId":152337,"journal":{"name":"Legal Geography","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429426308-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Addressing climate change demands a reconfiguration of often taken-for-granted social relations, especially with respect to the power structures undergirding our energy systems and the associated extraction and accumulation regimes. Social science on the extractive industries and energy sector has burgeoned over the last decade. Much of this research, notably that informed by Marxist analyses, points to the large, entangled structural forces in play, forces that reveal how entwined the mining and energy sectors are with other sectors, including the public sector (e.g. Baer 2016). Other research focuses on particular cases and groups of decision-makers (e.g. Snell 2018), including local groups involved in, for example, contesting a new coal mine or establishing a new renewable energy project by negotiating externally imposed legal requirements and policy settings (e.g. Moffatt and Baker 2013). While both of these areas of research that on broad-scale structures and that on local cases are important, they tend to leave intact a major blind spot: the everyday social processes, practices, dynamics and systems, and the individuals and local interpersonal interactions, which imagined high-level structures actually consist of.
通过化石燃料制度的无大气层探索气候变化的产生
应对气候变化需要重新配置经常被视为理所当然的社会关系,特别是关于支撑我们能源系统的权力结构以及相关的开采和积累制度。关于采掘业和能源部门的社会科学在过去十年中迅速发展。这些研究,尤其是马克思主义分析的研究,指出了巨大的、纠缠在一起的结构性力量在起作用,这些力量揭示了采矿和能源部门与其他部门(包括公共部门)是如何纠缠在一起的(例如Baer 2016)。其他研究侧重于特定案例和决策者群体(例如Snell 2018),包括参与的当地团体,例如,通过谈判外部强加的法律要求和政策设置来竞争新煤矿或建立新的可再生能源项目(例如Moffatt和Baker 2013)。虽然这两个领域的研究都是关于大尺度结构和局部案例的,但它们往往没有留下一个主要的盲点:日常的社会过程、实践、动态和系统,以及个人和地方的人际互动,这些都是想象中的高层结构实际组成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信