Generation planning and investment under deregulated environment: comparison of USA and China

F. Wu, F. Wen, G. Duan
{"title":"Generation planning and investment under deregulated environment: comparison of USA and China","authors":"F. Wu, F. Wen, G. Duan","doi":"10.1109/PES.2004.1373075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The electric power industry all over the world has gone through a fundamental restructuring in recent years from regulated or state-owned monopolies to competitive markets. In many developed countries, such as the USA, where power companies are mostly investor-owned private enterprises, the changes are brought about in a large part because the generators of the independent power producers, originally introduced for environmental and conservation reasons in 1070's, that use newer technologies, can compete favorably with the generation from the traditional power companies. As a matter of fact, the guaranteed rate-of-return regulation has resulted on oversupply of generation in many developed countries. The developing countries in Asia, such as China, on the other hand, with their rapid economic development, face totally different pressures. Economic growth has driven up even higher growth in electricity. These countries are hard pressed to come up with the necessary capital to build the huge demand of additional generators. As a result, countries are changing the laws and rules to encourage private investment in electric generation. Private generators are then demanding open markets for fair competition and potential expansion of capacity in all three sectors, i.e. generation, higher return. The promise of the competitive market is a more efficient and responsive industry. The electric power industry is an established industry. Its investment, especially in generation, is relatively high and takes a long period of commitment. Electricity plays a tremendously important and indispensable role in the modern society: in individual's daily life and society's economic well-being. Policy makers are straddled with the difficult issue of balancing the adequacy and cost of power supply. Different rules and processes have been devised for generation planning and investment as part of the experiment in restructuring. There is no clear winner of an ideal or optimal solution. In this paper, after a brief introduction of the power industry and the current status of restructuring in China, we first discuss the process for generation planning and investment in the well as in China and then compare the impact of such different approaches in terms of the goals of deregulation, i.e., efficiency incentive, economic signaling and risk distribution","PeriodicalId":236779,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004.","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2004.1373075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The electric power industry all over the world has gone through a fundamental restructuring in recent years from regulated or state-owned monopolies to competitive markets. In many developed countries, such as the USA, where power companies are mostly investor-owned private enterprises, the changes are brought about in a large part because the generators of the independent power producers, originally introduced for environmental and conservation reasons in 1070's, that use newer technologies, can compete favorably with the generation from the traditional power companies. As a matter of fact, the guaranteed rate-of-return regulation has resulted on oversupply of generation in many developed countries. The developing countries in Asia, such as China, on the other hand, with their rapid economic development, face totally different pressures. Economic growth has driven up even higher growth in electricity. These countries are hard pressed to come up with the necessary capital to build the huge demand of additional generators. As a result, countries are changing the laws and rules to encourage private investment in electric generation. Private generators are then demanding open markets for fair competition and potential expansion of capacity in all three sectors, i.e. generation, higher return. The promise of the competitive market is a more efficient and responsive industry. The electric power industry is an established industry. Its investment, especially in generation, is relatively high and takes a long period of commitment. Electricity plays a tremendously important and indispensable role in the modern society: in individual's daily life and society's economic well-being. Policy makers are straddled with the difficult issue of balancing the adequacy and cost of power supply. Different rules and processes have been devised for generation planning and investment as part of the experiment in restructuring. There is no clear winner of an ideal or optimal solution. In this paper, after a brief introduction of the power industry and the current status of restructuring in China, we first discuss the process for generation planning and investment in the well as in China and then compare the impact of such different approaches in terms of the goals of deregulation, i.e., efficiency incentive, economic signaling and risk distribution
放松管制环境下的发电规划与投资:中美比较
近年来,世界各地的电力工业都经历了从受管制或国有垄断到竞争市场的根本性重组。在许多发达国家,如美国,那里的电力公司大多是投资者拥有的私营企业,这些变化在很大程度上是因为独立电力生产商的发电机,最初是在20世纪70年代为环境和保护原因引入的,使用更新的技术,可以与传统电力公司的发电竞争。事实上,在许多发达国家,保证回报率的监管导致了发电供过于求。另一方面,亚洲的发展中国家,如中国,随着经济的快速发展,面临着完全不同的压力。经济增长推动了电力的更高增长。这些国家很难拿出必要的资金来满足对新增发电机的巨大需求。因此,各国正在修改法律法规,鼓励私人投资发电。因此,私营发电企业要求开放市场,以实现公平竞争,并在所有三个部门扩大产能,即发电和更高的回报。竞争市场的前景是一个更高效、反应更灵敏的行业。电力工业是一个成熟的工业。它的投资,特别是在发电方面,相对较高,需要很长时间的承诺。在现代社会中,无论是个人的日常生活还是社会的经济福祉,电力都扮演着极其重要和不可或缺的角色。政策制定者面临着平衡电力供应充足性和成本的难题。作为改组试验的一部分,为发电规划和投资制定了不同的规则和程序。理想或最优解决方案没有明确的赢家。在本文中,在简要介绍了中国的电力行业和重组现状之后,我们首先讨论了中国的发电规划和投资过程,然后从放松管制的目标(即效率激励、经济信号和风险分配)方面比较了这种不同方法的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信