Fathers and Sons

M. Davis
{"title":"Fathers and Sons","authors":"M. Davis","doi":"10.1515/9780822393696-002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English-Canadian Calvinism shares a common denominator with the Jansenism of French-Canadian Catholicism. The root of both is Augustinian theology as interpreted by Calvin, and by Jansen after him. \"In its doctrine of hereditary corruption, universal deprivation, and complete loss of spiritual freedom on the part of man,\" says one authoritative source, \"Calvin takes over almost unchanged the doctrine of Augustine.\" Similarly, says another, \"Jansen adopted in their entirety the most rigid of St. Augustine's formulas, and adhered especially... to the most rigid [gratuitous predestination]....\" In treating of the Fall of man Jansen assumed \"a very pessimistic standpoint in which he presented as absolute the power of concupiscence over free will, thenceforth inclined to sin.\" The doctrine of predestination affirmed by Calvin and Jansen raised thorny problems of divine grace for orthodox theologians. Given the total depravity of man since the Fall — not only in his spiritual nature but also in his human powers of intellection and will — then \"all man's works are contaminated by sin\" (NCE, II, 1092), and human activity is impotent to establish a proper relationship with god. It is an image of man corrupted into a \"horrible deformity,\" as Calvin put it. Salvation then, is absolutely in the divine will and not at all in man's merits and good works, for predestination either to election or reprobation is presented as independent of God's foreknowledge of individual merit.","PeriodicalId":372789,"journal":{"name":"Life Within Limits","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life Within Limits","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822393696-002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

English-Canadian Calvinism shares a common denominator with the Jansenism of French-Canadian Catholicism. The root of both is Augustinian theology as interpreted by Calvin, and by Jansen after him. "In its doctrine of hereditary corruption, universal deprivation, and complete loss of spiritual freedom on the part of man," says one authoritative source, "Calvin takes over almost unchanged the doctrine of Augustine." Similarly, says another, "Jansen adopted in their entirety the most rigid of St. Augustine's formulas, and adhered especially... to the most rigid [gratuitous predestination]...." In treating of the Fall of man Jansen assumed "a very pessimistic standpoint in which he presented as absolute the power of concupiscence over free will, thenceforth inclined to sin." The doctrine of predestination affirmed by Calvin and Jansen raised thorny problems of divine grace for orthodox theologians. Given the total depravity of man since the Fall — not only in his spiritual nature but also in his human powers of intellection and will — then "all man's works are contaminated by sin" (NCE, II, 1092), and human activity is impotent to establish a proper relationship with god. It is an image of man corrupted into a "horrible deformity," as Calvin put it. Salvation then, is absolutely in the divine will and not at all in man's merits and good works, for predestination either to election or reprobation is presented as independent of God's foreknowledge of individual merit.
父亲与儿子
英裔加拿大人的加尔文主义与法裔加拿大人的詹森主义有共同之处。两者的根源都是由加尔文和他之后的詹森所诠释的奥古斯丁神学。“在其关于世袭腐败,普遍剥夺,以及人类完全丧失精神自由的教义中,”一位权威人士说,“加尔文几乎毫无改变地继承了奥古斯丁的教义。”同样,另一个人说,“詹森完全采用了圣奥古斯丁最严格的公式,并特别坚持……到最僵硬的[无端的宿命]...."在对待人类的堕落时,詹森采取了“一种非常悲观的立场,在这种立场上,他将贪欲的绝对力量呈现在自由意志之上,从此倾向于犯罪。”加尔文和詹森所肯定的预定论为正统神学家提出了神圣恩典的棘手问题。鉴于人类自堕落以来的完全堕落——不仅在他的精神本质上,而且在他的智力和意志的人类力量上——那么“所有人的工作都被罪污染了”(NCE, II, 1092),人类的活动是无力与上帝建立适当的关系的。正如加尔文所说,这是一个堕落成“可怕的畸形”的人的形象。因此,救恩绝对是在神的旨意中,而不是在人的功绩和善行中,因为无论是拣选还是谴责的预定都是独立于神对个人功绩的预知的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信