Floor control alternatives for distributed videoconferencing over IP networks

J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, P. Mantey, Sireesh N. Potireddy
{"title":"Floor control alternatives for distributed videoconferencing over IP networks","authors":"J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, P. Mantey, Sireesh N. Potireddy","doi":"10.1109/COLCOM.2005.1651241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Applications that require the communication of multiple video streams can consume considerable bandwidth and computing resources, which poses a challenge for the widespread use of videoconferencing over the IP Internet. On the one hand, the bandwidth of the link connecting a given participant to a videoconferencing session may not be enough to support many video streams at bit rates of 500 kbps or more, especially when the participant is connecting to the rest of the Internet through a wireless link. On the other hand, the processing capacity of a participating site may not be enough to decode several video streams in real time. This paper explores the use of floor control over videoconferencing applications as a means to support videoconferences with many participating sites, but with a processing and communication overhead per site that is equivalent to a two-party videoconference. The main tradeoff we explore is the scalability attained with floor control versus the latencies incurred with floor transitions, which can be much too disruptive to the videoconference participants. We present a viable compromise in which only the video stream of the \"floor holder\" is sent to all sites, but the floor-passing protocol is such that it supports a brief overlap of the transmissions from the old and the new floor holder, such that the participants in the videoconference can instantaneously switch over to the media streams of the next speaker in an apparently seamless transition. Experimental results and implementation in a research video-conferencing system show that the proposed protocol can run effectively, eliminating race conditions, while maintaining scalability and reliability","PeriodicalId":365186,"journal":{"name":"2005 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2005 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COLCOM.2005.1651241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Applications that require the communication of multiple video streams can consume considerable bandwidth and computing resources, which poses a challenge for the widespread use of videoconferencing over the IP Internet. On the one hand, the bandwidth of the link connecting a given participant to a videoconferencing session may not be enough to support many video streams at bit rates of 500 kbps or more, especially when the participant is connecting to the rest of the Internet through a wireless link. On the other hand, the processing capacity of a participating site may not be enough to decode several video streams in real time. This paper explores the use of floor control over videoconferencing applications as a means to support videoconferences with many participating sites, but with a processing and communication overhead per site that is equivalent to a two-party videoconference. The main tradeoff we explore is the scalability attained with floor control versus the latencies incurred with floor transitions, which can be much too disruptive to the videoconference participants. We present a viable compromise in which only the video stream of the "floor holder" is sent to all sites, but the floor-passing protocol is such that it supports a brief overlap of the transmissions from the old and the new floor holder, such that the participants in the videoconference can instantaneously switch over to the media streams of the next speaker in an apparently seamless transition. Experimental results and implementation in a research video-conferencing system show that the proposed protocol can run effectively, eliminating race conditions, while maintaining scalability and reliability
IP网络上分布式视频会议的楼层控制替代方案
需要多个视频流通信的应用程序会消耗大量的带宽和计算资源,这对IP Internet上视频会议的广泛应用提出了挑战。一方面,连接给定参与者到视频会议会话的链路带宽可能不足以支持500 kbps或更高比特率的许多视频流,特别是当参与者通过无线链路连接到Internet的其余部分时。另一方面,参与站点的处理能力可能不足以实时解码多个视频流。本文探讨了在视频会议应用程序上使用楼层控制作为一种支持有许多参与站点的视频会议的手段,但是每个站点的处理和通信开销相当于两方视频会议。我们探索的主要权衡是楼层控制获得的可扩展性与楼层转换引起的延迟,这可能对视频会议参与者造成太大的干扰。我们提出了一个可行的折衷方案,其中只有“地板持有人”的视频流被发送到所有站点,但是地板传递协议是这样的,它支持从旧地板持有人和新地板持有人传输的短暂重叠,这样视频会议的参与者可以在明显无缝的过渡中立即切换到下一个发言者的媒体流。实验结果和在研究视频会议系统中的实现表明,该协议能够有效运行,消除竞争条件,同时保持可扩展性和可靠性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信