From Taxonomy to Requirements: A Task Space Partitioning Approach

M. El-Shehaly, Natasha Alvarado, Lynn McVey, R. Randell, M. Mamas, R. Ruddle
{"title":"From Taxonomy to Requirements: A Task Space Partitioning Approach","authors":"M. El-Shehaly, Natasha Alvarado, Lynn McVey, R. Randell, M. Mamas, R. Ruddle","doi":"10.1109/BELIV.2018.8634027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a taxonomy-driven approach to requirements specification in a large-scale project setting, drawing on our work to develop visualization dashboards for improving the quality of healthcare. Our aim is to overcome some of the limitations of the qualitative methods that are typically used for requirements analysis. When applied alone, methods like interviews fall short in identifying the full set of functionalities that a visualization system should support. We present a five-stage pipeline to structure user task elicitation and analysis around well-established taxonomic dimensions, and make the following contributions: (i) criteria for selecting dimensions from the large body of task taxonomies in the literature,, (ii) use of three particular dimensions (granularity, type cardinality and target) to create materials for a requirements analysis workshop with domain experts, (iii) a method for characterizing the task space that was produced by the experts in the workshop, (iv) a decision tree that partitions that space and maps it to visualization design alternatives, and (v) validating our approach by testing the decision tree against new tasks that collected through interviews with further domain experts.","PeriodicalId":269472,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Evaluation and Beyond - Methodological Approaches for Visualization (BELIV)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Evaluation and Beyond - Methodological Approaches for Visualization (BELIV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BELIV.2018.8634027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We present a taxonomy-driven approach to requirements specification in a large-scale project setting, drawing on our work to develop visualization dashboards for improving the quality of healthcare. Our aim is to overcome some of the limitations of the qualitative methods that are typically used for requirements analysis. When applied alone, methods like interviews fall short in identifying the full set of functionalities that a visualization system should support. We present a five-stage pipeline to structure user task elicitation and analysis around well-established taxonomic dimensions, and make the following contributions: (i) criteria for selecting dimensions from the large body of task taxonomies in the literature,, (ii) use of three particular dimensions (granularity, type cardinality and target) to create materials for a requirements analysis workshop with domain experts, (iii) a method for characterizing the task space that was produced by the experts in the workshop, (iv) a decision tree that partitions that space and maps it to visualization design alternatives, and (v) validating our approach by testing the decision tree against new tasks that collected through interviews with further domain experts.
从分类法到需求:任务空间划分方法
我们在大型项目设置中提出了一种分类法驱动的需求规范方法,利用我们开发可视化仪表板以提高医疗保健质量的工作。我们的目标是克服通常用于需求分析的定性方法的一些限制。当单独应用时,像访谈这样的方法在识别可视化系统应该支持的全部功能方面是不够的。我们提出了一个五阶段的管道来围绕已建立的分类维度构建用户任务激发和分析,并做出了以下贡献:(i)从文献中的大量任务分类法中选择维度的标准,(ii)使用三个特定维度(粒度,类型基数和目标)为有领域专家的需求分析研讨会创建材料,(iii)表征由研讨会专家产生的任务空间的方法,(iv)划分该空间并将其映射到可视化设计备选方案的决策树,(v)通过测试决策树来验证我们的方法,这些决策树是通过与更多领域专家的访谈收集而来的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信