DNA Mismatch Repair Proteins and BRAF V600E Detection by Immunohistochemistry in Colorectal Cancer Demonstrates Concordance with Next Generation Sequencing

Joel Yambert, L. A. Henricksen, June Clements, Andrew Hannon, Alyssa Jordan, Shalini Singh, K. Dvorak, C. Pritchard, Eric Q. Konnick
{"title":"DNA Mismatch Repair Proteins and BRAF V600E Detection by Immunohistochemistry in Colorectal Cancer Demonstrates Concordance with Next Generation Sequencing","authors":"Joel Yambert, L. A. Henricksen, June Clements, Andrew Hannon, Alyssa Jordan, Shalini Singh, K. Dvorak, C. Pritchard, Eric Q. Konnick","doi":"10.3390/jmp3040029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Multiple laboratory methods are used to screen patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) for mismatch repair (MMR) protein deficiency to identify possible Lynch syndrome patients. The goal of this study was to compare the agreement between ready-to-use immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays for MLH-1, PMS-2, MSH-2, MSH-6, and mutated BRAF at V600E and molecular methods in CRC cases. The inclusion of the BRAF V600E mutation testing is important for the identification of patients with sporadic CRC, as the BRAF V600E mutation is very rarely observed in patients with Lynch syndrome tumors. Methods: CRC cases were analyzed by ColoSeqTM tumor sequencing assay and VENTANA MMR IHC Panel that included anti-MLH1, anti-PMS2, anti-MSH2, anti-MSH6, and anti-BRAF V600E antibodies. Additionally, CRC cases with MLH1 IHC loss were evaluated for MLH1 promoter hypermethylation. Results: One hundred and eighteen cases were analyzed. The overall percent agreement (OPA) for each evaluated marker status compared to next-generation sequencing (NGS) exceeded 96%. Twenty-three cases were positive for the BRAF V600E mutation by IHC and NGS, and twenty cases showed loss of MLH1 protein and were positive for MLH1 hypermethylation. Samples with loss of MMR protein expression by IHC demonstrated genetic and/or epigenetic alterations that were consistent with the observed protein expression patterns. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that ready-to-use IHC assays can correctly identify the loss of MMR proteins and the presence of mutated BRAF V600E protein, supporting the utility of the VENTANA MMR IHC Panel as an aid to stratify patients with sporadic CRC vs. potential Lynch syndrome.","PeriodicalId":124426,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Pathology","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp3040029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims: Multiple laboratory methods are used to screen patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) for mismatch repair (MMR) protein deficiency to identify possible Lynch syndrome patients. The goal of this study was to compare the agreement between ready-to-use immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays for MLH-1, PMS-2, MSH-2, MSH-6, and mutated BRAF at V600E and molecular methods in CRC cases. The inclusion of the BRAF V600E mutation testing is important for the identification of patients with sporadic CRC, as the BRAF V600E mutation is very rarely observed in patients with Lynch syndrome tumors. Methods: CRC cases were analyzed by ColoSeqTM tumor sequencing assay and VENTANA MMR IHC Panel that included anti-MLH1, anti-PMS2, anti-MSH2, anti-MSH6, and anti-BRAF V600E antibodies. Additionally, CRC cases with MLH1 IHC loss were evaluated for MLH1 promoter hypermethylation. Results: One hundred and eighteen cases were analyzed. The overall percent agreement (OPA) for each evaluated marker status compared to next-generation sequencing (NGS) exceeded 96%. Twenty-three cases were positive for the BRAF V600E mutation by IHC and NGS, and twenty cases showed loss of MLH1 protein and were positive for MLH1 hypermethylation. Samples with loss of MMR protein expression by IHC demonstrated genetic and/or epigenetic alterations that were consistent with the observed protein expression patterns. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that ready-to-use IHC assays can correctly identify the loss of MMR proteins and the presence of mutated BRAF V600E protein, supporting the utility of the VENTANA MMR IHC Panel as an aid to stratify patients with sporadic CRC vs. potential Lynch syndrome.
结直肠癌DNA错配修复蛋白和BRAF V600E免疫组化检测与下一代测序结果一致
背景与目的:使用多种实验室方法筛查结直肠癌(CRC)患者的错配修复(MMR)蛋白缺乏症,以识别可能的Lynch综合征患者。本研究的目的是比较即用免疫组织化学(IHC)检测MLH-1、PMS-2、MSH-2、MSH-6和V600E突变BRAF与分子方法在结直肠癌病例中的一致性。BRAF V600E突变检测对于识别散发性结直肠癌患者非常重要,因为BRAF V600E突变在Lynch综合征肿瘤患者中很少观察到。方法:采用ColoSeqTM肿瘤测序法和VENTANA MMR免疫组化检测,对结直肠癌病例进行抗mlh1、抗pms2、抗msh2、抗msh6和抗braf V600E抗体分析。此外,对MLH1 IHC缺失的CRC病例进行MLH1启动子超甲基化评估。结果:共分析了118例病例。与下一代测序(NGS)相比,每个评估标记状态的总体一致性(OPA)超过96%。IHC和NGS检测BRAF V600E突变阳性23例,MLH1蛋白缺失和MLH1超甲基化阳性20例。通过免疫组化检测,MMR蛋白表达缺失的样本显示出与观察到的蛋白表达模式一致的遗传和/或表观遗传改变。结论:本研究的结果表明,即用型免疫组化检测可以正确识别MMR蛋白的缺失和突变BRAF V600E蛋白的存在,支持VENTANA MMR免疫组化检测作为散发性结直肠癌与潜在Lynch综合征患者分层的辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信