Review of Translational Medicine and Drug Discovery

E. Tabor
{"title":"Review of Translational Medicine and Drug Discovery\n","authors":"E. Tabor","doi":"10.1177/0092861512436757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the term ‘‘translational research’’ first appeared in PubMed in 1993, it was not widely used until about 2000. Attention to it has surged since then in response to the discovery of new biomarkers and, more recently, to advances in biomarkers research. As a result of this trend, this book, Translational Medicine and Drug Discovery, is really about the role of biomarkers in translational research. A good biomarker can allow investigators to select patients for a targeted approach to treatment, increasing the chances that a study will have a successful outcome if the treatment is effective. A good biomarker also can shorten the time to completion of clinical (or nonclinical) studies, by permitting the early detection of safety or efficacy, or lack thereof. The need to validate biomarkers, to show their clinical relevance, is an important part of preparing to use them in clinical studies, and sometimes the validation can be incorporated in the first clinical study with the biomarker, establishing its usefulness for future studies as well. A philosophy of using biomarkers to build a program of drug discovery is described in one chapter of the book, written by a Merck executive. Merck has used biomarkers to develop targeted therapies, to reduce the length of clinical Phases 1 and 2 (Merck claims to have reduced the time from the industry average of 3.7 years to 2.5 years), and to identify sooner those products that will not make it past Phase 2. A culture was created in which a ‘‘failed’’ trial or program was considered really to be a success if the failure occurred early enough to allow the advancement of better programs. Their slogan is ‘‘Fail Fast, Fail Cheap,’’ and biomarkers have made this possible. The core chapters of the book address translational medicine and biomarkers in each of several diseases or conditions, and these chapters make this book valuable. They cover diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis, obesity, bone disorders, neuroscience, and oncology. There is also an extensive chapter on ‘‘imaging biomarkers.’’ I found the core chapter on translational medicine in diabetes mellitus to be particularly good. In studying anti-diabetic medications in normal volunteers in Phase 1, it is not possible to observe a glucose-dependant lowering of blood glucose since normal volunteer subjects are not hyperglycemic. However, biomarkers can allow one to study proof-of-mechanism in these normal subjects, to get a preliminary indication of activity of the molecule in humans at an early stage of development. This approach was used successfully in the development of DPP-4i drugs by measuring the effects of the drugs on DPP-4 activity in healthy volunteers, and validating this in later studies as a marker for the effect the drug would have on the glucose levels of hyperglycemic patients. One unusual chapter consists of the full text of a 2004 Pfizer document on biomarker validation and use, which defines the terms that are used in biomarker studies, the processes of validation of biomarkers, and the stages of applying them. Two other interesting chapters cover the European ‘‘Innovative Medicines Initiative’’ and the FDA’s public-private collaboration in the ‘‘Critical Path Institute’’ (and its Predictive Safety Testing Consortium of government, academic, and pharmaceutical company scientists working to evaluate and validate new biomarkers). Another chapter describes the Biomarkers Consortium, an organization that works under the aegis of the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health and coordinates the work of a group of government and industry organizations, as well as dozens of pharmaceutical companies and patient advocacy groups, to develop and validate new biomarkers. One other item that I would like to mention is a fascinating figure on page 330, a flow chart illustrating the patterns of pharmaceutical industry mergers since 1993. It shows a consolidation of 23 large pharmaceutical companies, most of which were household names in 1993, into 8 consolidated mega-companies by 2009. I only had one minor complaint about the book, and that was the excessive use of acronyms and other abbreviations in subtitles throughout the book, abbreviations such as ‘‘BIIF,’’ ‘‘MAC,’’ ‘‘PSTC,’’ ‘‘M&S’’ etc., which slowed the pace of reading. This is an important book in a relatively new and growing field. Anyone engaged in advanced research designed to bring new drugs and biologics to market will find it valuable.","PeriodicalId":391574,"journal":{"name":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861512436757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the term ‘‘translational research’’ first appeared in PubMed in 1993, it was not widely used until about 2000. Attention to it has surged since then in response to the discovery of new biomarkers and, more recently, to advances in biomarkers research. As a result of this trend, this book, Translational Medicine and Drug Discovery, is really about the role of biomarkers in translational research. A good biomarker can allow investigators to select patients for a targeted approach to treatment, increasing the chances that a study will have a successful outcome if the treatment is effective. A good biomarker also can shorten the time to completion of clinical (or nonclinical) studies, by permitting the early detection of safety or efficacy, or lack thereof. The need to validate biomarkers, to show their clinical relevance, is an important part of preparing to use them in clinical studies, and sometimes the validation can be incorporated in the first clinical study with the biomarker, establishing its usefulness for future studies as well. A philosophy of using biomarkers to build a program of drug discovery is described in one chapter of the book, written by a Merck executive. Merck has used biomarkers to develop targeted therapies, to reduce the length of clinical Phases 1 and 2 (Merck claims to have reduced the time from the industry average of 3.7 years to 2.5 years), and to identify sooner those products that will not make it past Phase 2. A culture was created in which a ‘‘failed’’ trial or program was considered really to be a success if the failure occurred early enough to allow the advancement of better programs. Their slogan is ‘‘Fail Fast, Fail Cheap,’’ and biomarkers have made this possible. The core chapters of the book address translational medicine and biomarkers in each of several diseases or conditions, and these chapters make this book valuable. They cover diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis, obesity, bone disorders, neuroscience, and oncology. There is also an extensive chapter on ‘‘imaging biomarkers.’’ I found the core chapter on translational medicine in diabetes mellitus to be particularly good. In studying anti-diabetic medications in normal volunteers in Phase 1, it is not possible to observe a glucose-dependant lowering of blood glucose since normal volunteer subjects are not hyperglycemic. However, biomarkers can allow one to study proof-of-mechanism in these normal subjects, to get a preliminary indication of activity of the molecule in humans at an early stage of development. This approach was used successfully in the development of DPP-4i drugs by measuring the effects of the drugs on DPP-4 activity in healthy volunteers, and validating this in later studies as a marker for the effect the drug would have on the glucose levels of hyperglycemic patients. One unusual chapter consists of the full text of a 2004 Pfizer document on biomarker validation and use, which defines the terms that are used in biomarker studies, the processes of validation of biomarkers, and the stages of applying them. Two other interesting chapters cover the European ‘‘Innovative Medicines Initiative’’ and the FDA’s public-private collaboration in the ‘‘Critical Path Institute’’ (and its Predictive Safety Testing Consortium of government, academic, and pharmaceutical company scientists working to evaluate and validate new biomarkers). Another chapter describes the Biomarkers Consortium, an organization that works under the aegis of the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health and coordinates the work of a group of government and industry organizations, as well as dozens of pharmaceutical companies and patient advocacy groups, to develop and validate new biomarkers. One other item that I would like to mention is a fascinating figure on page 330, a flow chart illustrating the patterns of pharmaceutical industry mergers since 1993. It shows a consolidation of 23 large pharmaceutical companies, most of which were household names in 1993, into 8 consolidated mega-companies by 2009. I only had one minor complaint about the book, and that was the excessive use of acronyms and other abbreviations in subtitles throughout the book, abbreviations such as ‘‘BIIF,’’ ‘‘MAC,’’ ‘‘PSTC,’’ ‘‘M&S’’ etc., which slowed the pace of reading. This is an important book in a relatively new and growing field. Anyone engaged in advanced research designed to bring new drugs and biologics to market will find it valuable.
转化医学与药物发现综述
尽管“转化研究”一词最早出现在1993年的PubMed上,但直到2000年左右才被广泛使用。从那时起,随着新的生物标志物的发现,以及最近生物标志物研究的进展,对它的关注激增。作为这种趋势的结果,这本书,转化医学和药物发现,是关于生物标志物在转化研究中的作用。一个好的生物标志物可以让研究人员选择有针对性的治疗方法,如果治疗有效,增加研究成功的机会。一个好的生物标志物也可以缩短完成临床(或非临床)研究的时间,允许早期检测安全性或有效性,或缺乏安全性或有效性。验证生物标记物,以显示其临床相关性,是准备在临床研究中使用它们的重要组成部分,有时验证可以纳入生物标记物的首次临床研究,以确定其对未来研究的有用性。书中有一章描述了利用生物标志物建立药物发现计划的理念,作者是默克公司的一位高管。默克公司使用生物标志物开发靶向治疗,缩短了临床1期和2期的时间(默克公司声称已将行业平均3.7年的时间缩短到2.5年),并更快地识别那些无法通过2期的产品。一种文化被创造出来,在这种文化中,如果一个“失败”的试验或项目发生得足够早,可以让更好的项目发展,那么它就被认为是真正成功的。他们的口号是“快速失败,廉价失败”,生物标志物使这成为可能。本书的核心章节涉及几种疾病或病症中的转化医学和生物标志物,这些章节使本书具有价值。包括糖尿病、动脉粥样硬化、肥胖、骨骼疾病、神经科学和肿瘤。还有一个关于“成像生物标志物”的广泛章节。“我发现关于糖尿病转化医学的核心章节特别好。在正常志愿者的1期抗糖尿病药物研究中,由于正常志愿者受试者没有高血糖,因此不可能观察到葡萄糖依赖性的血糖降低。然而,生物标记物可以允许人们在这些正常受试者中研究证明机制,从而在早期发育阶段获得分子在人类中的活性的初步指示。通过测量药物对健康志愿者体内DPP-4活性的影响,这种方法成功地应用于DPP-4i药物的开发中,并在后来的研究中验证了这一点,作为药物对高血糖患者血糖水平的影响的标志。一个不寻常的章节包括2004年辉瑞公司关于生物标记物验证和使用的文件全文,该文件定义了生物标记物研究中使用的术语,生物标记物验证的过程以及应用它们的阶段。另外两个有趣的章节涵盖了欧洲“创新药物计划”和FDA在“关键路径研究所”的公私合作(以及由政府、学术界和制药公司科学家组成的预测性安全测试联盟,致力于评估和验证新的生物标志物)。另一章描述了生物标志物联盟,这是一个在美国国立卫生研究院基金会的支持下工作的组织,它协调了一组政府和行业组织,以及数十家制药公司和患者倡导团体的工作,以开发和验证新的生物标志物。我想提到的另一个项目是330页上的一个有趣的图表,这是一个流程图,说明了1993年以来制药行业合并的模式。报告显示,到2009年,23家大型制药公司(其中大多数在1993年还是家喻户晓的公司)合并为8家合并后的大型公司。我对这本书只有一个小小的不满,那就是在整本书的字幕中过度使用首字母缩略词和其他缩写,如“BIIF”、“MAC”、“PSTC”、“M&S”等缩写,这减慢了阅读的速度。在一个相对较新的和不断发展的领域,这是一本重要的书。任何从事旨在将新药和生物制剂推向市场的高级研究的人都会发现它的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信