Differences in Visual Sensibility Evaluation of Basic Color Fashion Materials in Person and on Digital Screens

Jinyoun Kim, YungKyung Park
{"title":"Differences in Visual Sensibility Evaluation of Basic Color Fashion Materials in Person and on Digital Screens","authors":"Jinyoun Kim, YungKyung Park","doi":"10.14695/KJSOS.2020.23.4.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1) The perception of a fashion product may vary depending on the texture and color of its material. Additionally, the product may appear differently in person versus on a digital screen. Therefore, in the present study, we sought to investigate the differences in visual sensibility evaluation between materials in person and on digital screens. In this study, three pairs of visual sensibility adjectives were tested for 60 samples selected as fashion materials. Fashion materials were divided into colors, embossings, and visual clarity categories. Results showed that each color had the same sense during in-person and digital evaluation. In terms of visual sensibility according to embossing, both in-person and digital evaluations of materials with embossings were found to have the same visual sense, whereas those without embossings looked different between in-person and digital evaluations. Assessments based on visual classification showed that both in-person and digital evaluations had the same sensibility. This study is meaningful in suggesting that when evaluating the visual sense of fashion material, the sensation for the digital screen versus in person may be different in some cases.","PeriodicalId":153223,"journal":{"name":"Korean Society for Emotion and Sensibility","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Society for Emotion and Sensibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14695/KJSOS.2020.23.4.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1) The perception of a fashion product may vary depending on the texture and color of its material. Additionally, the product may appear differently in person versus on a digital screen. Therefore, in the present study, we sought to investigate the differences in visual sensibility evaluation between materials in person and on digital screens. In this study, three pairs of visual sensibility adjectives were tested for 60 samples selected as fashion materials. Fashion materials were divided into colors, embossings, and visual clarity categories. Results showed that each color had the same sense during in-person and digital evaluation. In terms of visual sensibility according to embossing, both in-person and digital evaluations of materials with embossings were found to have the same visual sense, whereas those without embossings looked different between in-person and digital evaluations. Assessments based on visual classification showed that both in-person and digital evaluations had the same sensibility. This study is meaningful in suggesting that when evaluating the visual sense of fashion material, the sensation for the digital screen versus in person may be different in some cases.
基本色彩服装面料在人与数字屏幕上的视觉敏感性评价差异
1)对时尚产品的感知可能会因其材料的质地和颜色而有所不同。此外,产品在个人和数字屏幕上的显示可能不同。因此,在本研究中,我们试图探讨实物和数字屏幕上的材料在视觉敏感性评估方面的差异。在本研究中,三对视觉敏感性形容词测试了60个样本作为时装材料。时装材料分为颜色、浮雕和视觉清晰度三类。结果表明,在现场和数字评估中,每种颜色都具有相同的感觉。在视觉感受力方面,有压花的实物评价与数字评价的视觉感受力相同,而没有压花的实物评价与数字评价的视觉感受力不同。基于视觉分类的评估表明,面对面评估和数字评估具有相同的敏感性。这项研究的意义在于,当评估时尚材料的视觉感觉时,在某些情况下,数字屏幕和真人的感觉可能会有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信