Subjectivity as the Main Scientific Problem of “Digital Law”: Development of a Hypothesis

V. Arkhipov
{"title":"Subjectivity as the Main Scientific Problem of “Digital Law”: Development of a Hypothesis","authors":"V. Arkhipov","doi":"10.18572/1811-1475-2023-4-14-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital law is a polysemous phrase widely used in contemporary legal studies. From the point of view of analytical jurisprudence, its central meaning is defined by the “pervasive digital technologies” (artificial intelligence, distributed ledger systems, etc.). Doctrinal understanding of the problems of digital law requires the identification of a universal problem, as which the article proposes as a hypothesis the problem of agency in the broad sense of the word. The approach can be argued deductively and inductively. From the deductive point of view, agency is the central problem of the general filed of the philosophy of law and, as such, it should also be seen in specific fields of knowledge. From the inductive point of view, in the main specific problems of certain “pervasive digital technologies” there is a common feature of their connection with the problem of agency, which is demonstrated in the article on the basis of the technology of artificial intelligence. Confirmation of the hypothesis of subjectivity as the main problem of digital law (or an academic convention regarding such a hypothesis) will mean the existence of a general doctrinal principle to be taken into account in various forms of law-making and lawenforcement activities in cases where the formal-legal method cannot be applied due to objective circumstance.","PeriodicalId":210234,"journal":{"name":"Juridical World","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1811-1475-2023-4-14-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital law is a polysemous phrase widely used in contemporary legal studies. From the point of view of analytical jurisprudence, its central meaning is defined by the “pervasive digital technologies” (artificial intelligence, distributed ledger systems, etc.). Doctrinal understanding of the problems of digital law requires the identification of a universal problem, as which the article proposes as a hypothesis the problem of agency in the broad sense of the word. The approach can be argued deductively and inductively. From the deductive point of view, agency is the central problem of the general filed of the philosophy of law and, as such, it should also be seen in specific fields of knowledge. From the inductive point of view, in the main specific problems of certain “pervasive digital technologies” there is a common feature of their connection with the problem of agency, which is demonstrated in the article on the basis of the technology of artificial intelligence. Confirmation of the hypothesis of subjectivity as the main problem of digital law (or an academic convention regarding such a hypothesis) will mean the existence of a general doctrinal principle to be taken into account in various forms of law-making and lawenforcement activities in cases where the formal-legal method cannot be applied due to objective circumstance.
主体性作为“数字法”的主要科学问题:一个假设的发展
数字法是当代法学研究中广泛使用的一个多义短语。从分析法理学的角度来看,其核心含义是由“无处不在的数字技术”(人工智能、分布式账本系统等)定义的。对数字法问题的理论理解需要确定一个普遍的问题,本文提出了一个假设,即广义上的代理问题。这种方法可以用演绎和归纳来论证。从演绎的观点来看,代理是法律哲学一般领域的中心问题,因此,它也应该在特定的知识领域中被看到。从归纳的角度看,在某些“普及数字技术”的主要具体问题中,存在着与代理问题联系的共同特征,本文在人工智能技术的基础上对此进行了论证。确认主观性假设是数字法的主要问题(或关于这一假设的学术惯例),将意味着在各种形式的立法和执法活动中,在由于客观情况而不能适用正式法律方法的情况下,存在一个一般的理论原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信