[R]

B. Borsos, Hajnalka Majoros, T. Pankotai
{"title":"[R]","authors":"B. Borsos, Hajnalka Majoros, T. Pankotai","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1q26vgc.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antimicrobial stewardship interventions are targeted efforts by healthcare organizations to optimize antimicrobial use in clinical practice. The study aimed to explore effective interventions in improving antimicrobial use in hospitals. Literature was systemically searched for interventional studies through PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases that were published in the period between January 2010 to April 2022. A random-effects model was used to pool and evaluate data from eligible studies that reported antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions in outpatient and inpatient settings. Pooled estimates presented as proportions and standardized mean differences. Forty-eight articles were included in this review: 32 in inpatient and 16 in outpatient settings. Seventeen interventions have been identified, and eight outcomes have been targeted. AMS interventions improved clinical, microbiological, and cost outcomes in most studies. When comparing nonintervention with intervention groups using meta-analysis, there was an insignificant reduction in length of stay (MD: −0.99; 95% CI: −2.38, 0.39) and a significant reduction in antibiotics’ days of therapy (MD: −2.73; 95% CI: −3.92, −1.54). There were noticeable reductions in readmissions, mortality rates, and antibiotic prescriptions post antimicrobial stewardship multi-disciplinary team (AMS-MDT) interventions. Studies that involved a pharmacist as part of the AMS-MDT showed more significant improvement in measured outcomes than the studies that did not involve a phar-","PeriodicalId":132963,"journal":{"name":"Les noms officiels des communes de Wallonie, de Bruxelles-Capitale et de la communaute germanophone","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Les noms officiels des communes de Wallonie, de Bruxelles-Capitale et de la communaute germanophone","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1q26vgc.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antimicrobial stewardship interventions are targeted efforts by healthcare organizations to optimize antimicrobial use in clinical practice. The study aimed to explore effective interventions in improving antimicrobial use in hospitals. Literature was systemically searched for interventional studies through PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases that were published in the period between January 2010 to April 2022. A random-effects model was used to pool and evaluate data from eligible studies that reported antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions in outpatient and inpatient settings. Pooled estimates presented as proportions and standardized mean differences. Forty-eight articles were included in this review: 32 in inpatient and 16 in outpatient settings. Seventeen interventions have been identified, and eight outcomes have been targeted. AMS interventions improved clinical, microbiological, and cost outcomes in most studies. When comparing nonintervention with intervention groups using meta-analysis, there was an insignificant reduction in length of stay (MD: −0.99; 95% CI: −2.38, 0.39) and a significant reduction in antibiotics’ days of therapy (MD: −2.73; 95% CI: −3.92, −1.54). There were noticeable reductions in readmissions, mortality rates, and antibiotic prescriptions post antimicrobial stewardship multi-disciplinary team (AMS-MDT) interventions. Studies that involved a pharmacist as part of the AMS-MDT showed more significant improvement in measured outcomes than the studies that did not involve a phar-
[R]
抗菌药物管理干预措施是有针对性的努力,由医疗机构优化抗菌药物的使用在临床实践。本研究旨在探讨提高医院抗菌药物使用的有效干预措施。通过PubMed、CINAHL和Scopus数据库系统检索2010年1月至2022年4月期间发表的介入研究文献。随机效应模型用于汇总和评估来自符合条件的研究的数据,这些研究报告了门诊和住院环境中的抗菌药物管理(AMS)干预措施。汇总估计以比例和标准化平均差异表示。本综述纳入48篇文章:住院32篇,门诊16篇。已经确定了17项干预措施,并确定了8项结果。在大多数研究中,AMS干预措施改善了临床、微生物学和成本结果。当使用荟萃分析将未干预组与干预组进行比较时,住院时间的减少不显著(MD: - 0.99;95% CI: - 2.38, 0.39),抗生素治疗天数显著减少(MD: - 2.73;95% ci:−3.92,−1.54)。在抗菌药物管理多学科团队(AMS-MDT)干预后,再入院率、死亡率和抗生素处方明显减少。有药剂师参与AMS-MDT的研究比没有药剂师参与的研究在测量结果上有更显著的改善
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信