Public Open Spaces: Enabling or Impeding Inclusive Evacuation during Disasters

Andrea Pacheco Barzallo, José Fariña, Eva Álvarez de Andrés
{"title":"Public Open Spaces: Enabling or Impeding Inclusive Evacuation during Disasters","authors":"Andrea Pacheco Barzallo, José Fariña, Eva Álvarez de Andrés","doi":"10.32891/jps.v7i2.1474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During disasters the death of persons with disabilities is higher than that of the rest of the population. This problem has many causes, and one of them has to do with the conditions of the physical environments which are not accessible for all, implying that people with disabilities require more time and effort to try to escape from dangerous places, protect themselves, and reach safety areas such as public spaces where people can gather, help each other, and remain safe at least during the first hours of an emergency. Thus, identifying the main problems that could prevent public spaces from becoming risk handling and inclusion resources during a disaster within social production settings is the main purpose of this research. The methodology used includes literature review, spatial audits based on inclusion and risk reduction standards within all public spaces of three neighborhoods of the city of Quito in Ecuador, and focus groups with the neighbors, persons with disabilities and their families. The three case studies selected are Atucucho, Carapungo and Auqui de Monjas, all present high disaster risk levels and have characteristics of social production of their territories. The results show that the conditions that need attention to enable public spaces become risk handling and inclusion resources during disasters have to do with three different dimensions; the first one refers to their physical characteristics and informational elements which must comply with universal accessibility requirements that provide autonomy and safety to all; the second dimension has to do with their connectivity, both on their ability to generate a network close to the community as well as to multi-modal mobility; the third dimension has to do with social and cultural aspects as persons with disabilities often feel that public spaces are not friendly for them because these are being occupied by other groups such as young people or that they are privatized in some way. \n  \nRead the full article in accessible html-format here.","PeriodicalId":407771,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Public Space","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Public Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32891/jps.v7i2.1474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

During disasters the death of persons with disabilities is higher than that of the rest of the population. This problem has many causes, and one of them has to do with the conditions of the physical environments which are not accessible for all, implying that people with disabilities require more time and effort to try to escape from dangerous places, protect themselves, and reach safety areas such as public spaces where people can gather, help each other, and remain safe at least during the first hours of an emergency. Thus, identifying the main problems that could prevent public spaces from becoming risk handling and inclusion resources during a disaster within social production settings is the main purpose of this research. The methodology used includes literature review, spatial audits based on inclusion and risk reduction standards within all public spaces of three neighborhoods of the city of Quito in Ecuador, and focus groups with the neighbors, persons with disabilities and their families. The three case studies selected are Atucucho, Carapungo and Auqui de Monjas, all present high disaster risk levels and have characteristics of social production of their territories. The results show that the conditions that need attention to enable public spaces become risk handling and inclusion resources during disasters have to do with three different dimensions; the first one refers to their physical characteristics and informational elements which must comply with universal accessibility requirements that provide autonomy and safety to all; the second dimension has to do with their connectivity, both on their ability to generate a network close to the community as well as to multi-modal mobility; the third dimension has to do with social and cultural aspects as persons with disabilities often feel that public spaces are not friendly for them because these are being occupied by other groups such as young people or that they are privatized in some way.   Read the full article in accessible html-format here.
公共开放空间:灾害期间实现或阻碍包容性疏散
在灾害期间,残疾人的死亡率高于其他人口。这一问题有许多原因,其中之一与并非所有人都能进入的物理环境条件有关,这意味着残疾人需要更多的时间和精力来试图逃离危险场所,保护自己,并到达安全区域,如人们可以聚集的公共场所,相互帮助,至少在紧急情况发生的最初几个小时内保持安全。因此,在社会生产环境中,识别可能阻止公共空间成为灾害风险处理和包容资源的主要问题是本研究的主要目的。所使用的方法包括文献综述、基于包容和降低风险标准的空间审计,以及对厄瓜多尔基多市三个社区的所有公共空间进行审计,并与邻居、残疾人及其家人进行焦点小组讨论。选定的三个案例研究分别是Atucucho、Carapungo和Auqui de Monjas,它们都存在高灾害风险,并具有其领土的社会生产特征。结果表明,使公共空间在灾害中成为风险处理和包容资源需要注意的条件与三个不同的维度有关;第一个是指它们的物理特征和信息元素必须符合普遍的无障碍要求,为所有人提供自主性和安全性;第二个方面与它们的连通性有关,既要有能力建立一个靠近社区的网络,也要有能力实现多模式的移动性;第三个方面与社会和文化方面有关,因为残疾人经常觉得公共空间对他们不友好,因为这些空间被年轻人等其他群体占据,或者在某种程度上被私有化了。在这里以可访问的html格式阅读全文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信