PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN JUCAMA TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH SISWA KELAS IX MTSN 02 TAKENGON

Ali Umar
{"title":"PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN JUCAMA TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH SISWA KELAS IX MTSN 02 TAKENGON","authors":"Ali Umar","doi":"10.15548/MEJ.V4I1.1239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study supports 1). Knowing the differences in problem-solving abilities in students before and after being taught with the JUCAMA learning model; 2). Knowing students' problem solving skills between before and after being taught with the JUCAMA learning model in high initial students; 3). Knowing students' problem solving skills between before and after being taught with the JUCAMA learning model in students with low initial ability; 4). Conversation between initial ability and learning model on students' problem solving. This study uses quantitative research with a quasi-experimental type of research. The results showed 1). 95% (16.67> 9.98, tcount = 7.816> t table = 1.71; 2). The average problem solving ability of students in early ability students was higher after being taught with the JUCAMA learning model than before at 95% confidence level (16.09> 13.72, tcount = 15.53> ttable = 1.81); 3. The average problem solving ability of students in early ability students is lower after being taught with the JUCAMA learning model than before at 95% confidence level (10.31> 7.25, tcount = 5.21> ttable = 1.75). While the results of the interaction test showed there was no interaction between the initial ability and the learning model on the ability to solve students' problems at a 95% confidence level (Fcount = 0.29 <Ftable = 1.35), so that the JUCAMA learning model was suitable for use with diverse abilities . Based on the research it was also found that students needed more time than usual to solve problems of type solving problems.","PeriodicalId":231880,"journal":{"name":"Math Educa Journal","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Math Educa Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15548/MEJ.V4I1.1239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study supports 1). Knowing the differences in problem-solving abilities in students before and after being taught with the JUCAMA learning model; 2). Knowing students' problem solving skills between before and after being taught with the JUCAMA learning model in high initial students; 3). Knowing students' problem solving skills between before and after being taught with the JUCAMA learning model in students with low initial ability; 4). Conversation between initial ability and learning model on students' problem solving. This study uses quantitative research with a quasi-experimental type of research. The results showed 1). 95% (16.67> 9.98, tcount = 7.816> t table = 1.71; 2). The average problem solving ability of students in early ability students was higher after being taught with the JUCAMA learning model than before at 95% confidence level (16.09> 13.72, tcount = 15.53> ttable = 1.81); 3. The average problem solving ability of students in early ability students is lower after being taught with the JUCAMA learning model than before at 95% confidence level (10.31> 7.25, tcount = 5.21> ttable = 1.75). While the results of the interaction test showed there was no interaction between the initial ability and the learning model on the ability to solve students' problems at a 95% confidence level (Fcount = 0.29
JUCAMA学习模式对IX - MTSN 02 TAKENGON学生问题解决能力的影响
本研究支持1)了解学生在接受juama学习模式教学前后问题解决能力的差异;2)了解高初中生采用juama学习模式前后学生的问题解决能力;3)了解初始能力较低的学生在接受juama学习模式教学前后的问题解决能力;4)学生解决问题的初始能力与学习模式之间的对话。本研究采用准实验型的定量研究方法。结果显示1). 95% (16.67> 9.98,tcount = 7.816> t表= 1.71;2)在95%置信水平上,采用juama学习模型后,早期能力学生的平均问题解决能力显著高于未采用juama学习模型前(16.09> 13.72,tcount = 15.53> table = 1.81);3.在95%置信水平(10.31> 7.25,tcount = 5.21>表= 1.75)下,早期能力学生采用juama学习模型后,学生的平均问题解决能力低于采用juama学习模型前。而交互作用检验结果显示,初始能力与学习模型在解决学生问题的能力上没有交互作用(Fcount = 0.29
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信