Comparison of ultrasound scattering behavior of Optison/sup /spl reg// and a liquid perfluorocarbon nanoparticle contrast agent

M. Hughes, J. Marsh, A. Woodson, R.W. Fuhrhop, G. M. Lanza, S. Wickline
{"title":"Comparison of ultrasound scattering behavior of Optison/sup /spl reg// and a liquid perfluorocarbon nanoparticle contrast agent","authors":"M. Hughes, J. Marsh, A. Woodson, R.W. Fuhrhop, G. M. Lanza, S. Wickline","doi":"10.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1192685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previously we reported that useful ultrasound contrast enhancement could be obtained using a liquid emulsion contrast agent developed in our laboratory. Although the physical basis for this enhancement was not completely characterized, the effect was reproducible in vivo and in vitro. We now hypothesize that microbubble formation does not play a significant role in the acoustic behavior of these contrast agents. Otherwise, attenuation and backscatter would be significantly affected by changes in hydrostatic pressure and acoustic pressure, and would show evidence of scattering agent destruction as the duration of ultrasound exposure increased. Both low power (0.65 MPa) unipolar pulses and high-power (3 MPa) unipolar pulses were used to measure the attenuation coefficient of Optison and that of the emulsion. The coefficient was also measured using a high-power unipolar pulse preceded by 5 cycles of a 1 MHz sine-wave of the same amplitude, emitted at a high repetition frequency (5 kHz). Both specimens were held in a pressurized chamber in a water bath maintained at temperatures ranging from 37/spl deg/ to 50/spl deg/C. The emulsion nanoparticles were produced by methods standard in our laboratory using perfluorooctyl bromide (PFOB: boiling point 142/spl deg/C) as the major component. Particle size was measured at 276 nm. We varied ambient hydrostatic pressure (-50 to 200 mm Hg in 50 mm steps), duration of exposure to the acoustic field (2, 20, 40, 80 s), and peak positive and negative acoustic pressure (0.65 to 3.0 MPa).","PeriodicalId":378705,"journal":{"name":"2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings.","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1192685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Previously we reported that useful ultrasound contrast enhancement could be obtained using a liquid emulsion contrast agent developed in our laboratory. Although the physical basis for this enhancement was not completely characterized, the effect was reproducible in vivo and in vitro. We now hypothesize that microbubble formation does not play a significant role in the acoustic behavior of these contrast agents. Otherwise, attenuation and backscatter would be significantly affected by changes in hydrostatic pressure and acoustic pressure, and would show evidence of scattering agent destruction as the duration of ultrasound exposure increased. Both low power (0.65 MPa) unipolar pulses and high-power (3 MPa) unipolar pulses were used to measure the attenuation coefficient of Optison and that of the emulsion. The coefficient was also measured using a high-power unipolar pulse preceded by 5 cycles of a 1 MHz sine-wave of the same amplitude, emitted at a high repetition frequency (5 kHz). Both specimens were held in a pressurized chamber in a water bath maintained at temperatures ranging from 37/spl deg/ to 50/spl deg/C. The emulsion nanoparticles were produced by methods standard in our laboratory using perfluorooctyl bromide (PFOB: boiling point 142/spl deg/C) as the major component. Particle size was measured at 276 nm. We varied ambient hydrostatic pressure (-50 to 200 mm Hg in 50 mm steps), duration of exposure to the acoustic field (2, 20, 40, 80 s), and peak positive and negative acoustic pressure (0.65 to 3.0 MPa).
option /sup /spl reg//与液体全氟碳纳米颗粒造影剂超声散射行为的比较
以前我们报道过使用我们实验室开发的液体乳化液造影剂可以获得有用的超声造影剂增强。虽然这种增强的物理基础尚未完全确定,但这种效果在体内和体外都是可重复的。我们现在假设微泡的形成在这些造影剂的声学行为中不起重要作用。否则,衰减和后向散射将受到静水压力和声压变化的显著影响,并随着超声暴露时间的增加而呈现散射剂破坏的迹象。采用低功率(0.65 MPa)单极脉冲和高功率(3 MPa)单极脉冲测量了Optison和乳液的衰减系数。该系数还使用高功率单极脉冲进行测量,该脉冲之前以高重复频率(5 kHz)发射相同幅度的1 MHz正弦波5个周期。两个标本都被保存在水浴中的一个加压室中,保持在37到50的温度范围内。以全氟辛基溴(PFOB:沸点142/spl℃)为主要成分,按实验室标准方法制备了乳状纳米颗粒。在276 nm处测量粒径。我们改变了环境静水压力(-50至200毫米汞柱,每50毫米步),暴露于声场的持续时间(2、20、40、80秒),以及峰值正、负声压(0.65至3.0 MPa)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信