Bow tie testing: a testing pattern for product lines

M. Johansen, Øystein Haugen, Franck Fleurey
{"title":"Bow tie testing: a testing pattern for product lines","authors":"M. Johansen, Øystein Haugen, Franck Fleurey","doi":"10.1145/2396716.2396725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Verification of highly configurable systems poses a significant challenge, the challenge of knowing that every configuration works when there often are intractably many different configurations. When a homogeneous abstraction layer has many mutually exclusive alternative implementations, we might, according to the polymorphic server test pattern, test these implementations using one test suite targeted towards the abstraction layer which is then run for each concrete implementation of the abstraction layer. But, the pattern does not handle interaction testing. Combinatorial interaction testing is one of the more promising techniques for doing interaction testing of a software product line. The bow tie testing pattern describes how the configurations which differ only in the implementation layer require one test suite. In addition, comparing the execution results of one product with another provides for a test oracle. The pattern reduces the effort of testing a highly configurable system without reducing the error detection capabilities provided by ordinary combinatorial interaction testing. We present an example of a subset of the Eclipse IDE product line, and show that only 20 test suites is required to test 41 products, a significant reduction.","PeriodicalId":384476,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2396716.2396725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Verification of highly configurable systems poses a significant challenge, the challenge of knowing that every configuration works when there often are intractably many different configurations. When a homogeneous abstraction layer has many mutually exclusive alternative implementations, we might, according to the polymorphic server test pattern, test these implementations using one test suite targeted towards the abstraction layer which is then run for each concrete implementation of the abstraction layer. But, the pattern does not handle interaction testing. Combinatorial interaction testing is one of the more promising techniques for doing interaction testing of a software product line. The bow tie testing pattern describes how the configurations which differ only in the implementation layer require one test suite. In addition, comparing the execution results of one product with another provides for a test oracle. The pattern reduces the effort of testing a highly configurable system without reducing the error detection capabilities provided by ordinary combinatorial interaction testing. We present an example of a subset of the Eclipse IDE product line, and show that only 20 test suites is required to test 41 products, a significant reduction.
领结测试:产品线的测试模式
高度可配置系统的验证提出了一个重大的挑战,即在通常存在许多难以解决的不同配置时,要知道每种配置都可以工作。当同构抽象层有许多互斥的可选实现时,我们可以根据多态服务器测试模式,使用一个针对抽象层的测试套件测试这些实现,然后为抽象层的每个具体实现运行该测试套件。但是,该模式不处理交互测试。组合交互测试是对软件产品线进行交互测试的比较有前途的技术之一。领结测试模式描述了仅在实现层中不同的配置如何需要一个测试套件。此外,比较一个产品与另一个产品的执行结果提供了一个测试oracle。该模式减少了测试高度可配置系统的工作量,而不会降低普通组合交互测试提供的错误检测功能。我们给出了Eclipse IDE产品线的一个子集的示例,并展示了测试41个产品只需要20个测试套件,这是一个显著的减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信