THE CONTENT OF THE ORGANIZATION'S PREPARATION STAGES FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT RATING TAKING INTO ACCOUNT ESG FACTORS

Svetlana G. Tatarintseva, L. G. Baranova, Alla A. Geyser
{"title":"THE CONTENT OF THE ORGANIZATION'S PREPARATION STAGES FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT RATING TAKING INTO ACCOUNT ESG FACTORS","authors":"Svetlana G. Tatarintseva, L. G. Baranova, Alla A. Geyser","doi":"10.26653/2076-4650-2022-4-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article gives an excursion into the history of the general approach to the formation of ratings. The fact of the growing importance of rating companies in the financial and non-financial sectors of the economy, as a tool for assessing the achievements of organizations, is noted. The general structure of the stages of preparing a company for rating in the field of achieving sustainable development goals with an emphasis on non-financial ratings, taking into account ESG factors, is considered. The main rating companies were named and a comparison of a number of parameters of the Methodologies and Assessment Methods proposed by them was carried out. The main directions of the rating assessment are formulated, as well as the content of sections, groups, subgroups, target criteria, indicators. The performed analysis allows, on the one hand, to group, and, on the other hand, to detail the stages of preparation for rating, mainly for organizations of the higher education system. Particular attention is paid to the ESG section of block G- “Corporate governance”. Within this section, the main requirements for the formation of criteria and indicators of the ESG rating in the field of relations with stakeholders and non-financial reporting on sustainable development are deciphered. The composition of the information disclosed by universities in the sustainability report has been systematized. A general conclusion is made about the need for a systematic approach to the preparation, implementation and monitoring of a strategy and step-by-step actions developed by an individually developed organization in the direction of progressive movement towards the achievement of sustainable development goals with a focus on ESG. It is noted that the directions and criteria for rating, in particular, depend on the choice of a corporate governance model.","PeriodicalId":255412,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Review. Series 1. Economics and Law","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Review. Series 1. Economics and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26653/2076-4650-2022-4-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article gives an excursion into the history of the general approach to the formation of ratings. The fact of the growing importance of rating companies in the financial and non-financial sectors of the economy, as a tool for assessing the achievements of organizations, is noted. The general structure of the stages of preparing a company for rating in the field of achieving sustainable development goals with an emphasis on non-financial ratings, taking into account ESG factors, is considered. The main rating companies were named and a comparison of a number of parameters of the Methodologies and Assessment Methods proposed by them was carried out. The main directions of the rating assessment are formulated, as well as the content of sections, groups, subgroups, target criteria, indicators. The performed analysis allows, on the one hand, to group, and, on the other hand, to detail the stages of preparation for rating, mainly for organizations of the higher education system. Particular attention is paid to the ESG section of block G- “Corporate governance”. Within this section, the main requirements for the formation of criteria and indicators of the ESG rating in the field of relations with stakeholders and non-financial reporting on sustainable development are deciphered. The composition of the information disclosed by universities in the sustainability report has been systematized. A general conclusion is made about the need for a systematic approach to the preparation, implementation and monitoring of a strategy and step-by-step actions developed by an individually developed organization in the direction of progressive movement towards the achievement of sustainable development goals with a focus on ESG. It is noted that the directions and criteria for rating, in particular, depend on the choice of a corporate governance model.
考虑到esg因素的组织参与可持续发展评级准备阶段的内容
这篇文章简略地介绍了形成评级的一般方法的历史。会议指出,对经济的金融和非金融部门的公司进行评级,作为评估各组织成就的工具,其重要性日益增加。考虑到考虑到ESG因素,在实现可持续发展目标领域,重点是非财务评级的公司准备评级阶段的一般结构。对主要评级公司进行了命名,并对其提出的方法和评估方法的一些参数进行了比较。制定了评级评估的主要方向,以及分段、分组、子分组、目标标准、指标等内容。所进行的分析一方面可以对评级的准备阶段进行分组,另一方面也可以详细说明,主要是针对高等教育系统的组织。特别关注G块的ESG部分——“公司治理”。在本节中,解读了ESG评级在与利益相关者关系和可持续发展非财务报告领域形成标准和指标的主要要求。大学在可持续发展报告中披露的信息构成已经系统化。总的结论是,需要有系统的方法来编制、实施和监测由个别发展组织制定的战略和逐步采取的行动,以逐步实现以ESG为重点的可持续发展目标。值得注意的是,评级的方向和标准尤其取决于公司治理模式的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信