Recommended tactics for mass vaccination of healthy individuals and COVID-19 convalescents

A. Zilfyan, S. Avagyan, A. Muradyan, E.S. Barsegyan
{"title":"Recommended tactics for mass vaccination of healthy individuals and COVID-19 convalescents","authors":"A. Zilfyan, S. Avagyan, A. Muradyan, E.S. Barsegyan","doi":"10.56936/18290825-2022.16.1-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents our views on main scientific and methodological approaches regarding the advantages of conducting mass vaccination of healthy individuals and COVID-19 convalescents.\nFirst of all, the focus is on issues regarding the antigenic potencies of SARS-CoV-2, based on which vaccines have been created over the past three years that have successfully passed preclinical and clinical testing, as well as licensing. The subjects of specal discussion were aspects related to the short-term effect of the main vaccines, as a result of which revaccination is recommended. It is assumed that more than one antigenic determinant is expressed on the surface of SARS-CoV-2.\nIn the conclusion paragraph, we have presented our own concept on most topical situational issues among the population of many countries in the process of vaccination against COVID-19.\nIs it worth getting vaccinated at all if complications can arise that lead to disability and death even in practically healthy individuals, not to mention the elderly contingent with chronic diseases?\nIn making a positive decision, the question arises in terms of choosing a vaccine, since vaccines are used in different countries, in the production of which different scientific, methodological and technological approaches are used.\nIf there is a need for re-vaccination within a short period after the first vaccination?\nAs a rule, it is recommended to re-vaccinate in 14-30 days after the first vaccination. In this regard, there are concerns about the low efficacy (weak selective immunogenic activity) of vaccines.\nHow expedient, if not contraindicated, is to “fully” vaccinate patients in the recovery period, as well as over the next one to two months, if they have high levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies?\nIn case of re-vaccination, it is necessary to find out whether it is possible to get the second vaccination using a commercial vaccine of another manufacturer, especially since many developing countries do not currently have such a vaccine that has been introduced during the first vaccination.\nHow competent is it to vaccinate a wide range of healthy individuals against COVID-19 and influenza - for the same time or with the shortest time interval?","PeriodicalId":353660,"journal":{"name":"THE NEW ARMENIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE NEW ARMENIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56936/18290825-2022.16.1-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents our views on main scientific and methodological approaches regarding the advantages of conducting mass vaccination of healthy individuals and COVID-19 convalescents. First of all, the focus is on issues regarding the antigenic potencies of SARS-CoV-2, based on which vaccines have been created over the past three years that have successfully passed preclinical and clinical testing, as well as licensing. The subjects of specal discussion were aspects related to the short-term effect of the main vaccines, as a result of which revaccination is recommended. It is assumed that more than one antigenic determinant is expressed on the surface of SARS-CoV-2. In the conclusion paragraph, we have presented our own concept on most topical situational issues among the population of many countries in the process of vaccination against COVID-19. Is it worth getting vaccinated at all if complications can arise that lead to disability and death even in practically healthy individuals, not to mention the elderly contingent with chronic diseases? In making a positive decision, the question arises in terms of choosing a vaccine, since vaccines are used in different countries, in the production of which different scientific, methodological and technological approaches are used. If there is a need for re-vaccination within a short period after the first vaccination? As a rule, it is recommended to re-vaccinate in 14-30 days after the first vaccination. In this regard, there are concerns about the low efficacy (weak selective immunogenic activity) of vaccines. How expedient, if not contraindicated, is to “fully” vaccinate patients in the recovery period, as well as over the next one to two months, if they have high levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies? In case of re-vaccination, it is necessary to find out whether it is possible to get the second vaccination using a commercial vaccine of another manufacturer, especially since many developing countries do not currently have such a vaccine that has been introduced during the first vaccination. How competent is it to vaccinate a wide range of healthy individuals against COVID-19 and influenza - for the same time or with the shortest time interval?
对健康个体和COVID-19康复者进行大规模疫苗接种的推荐策略
本文就开展健康人群和COVID-19恢复期人群大规模疫苗接种优势的主要科学和方法途径提出了自己的看法。首先,重点是SARS-CoV-2的抗原性问题,在此基础上,过去三年开发的疫苗成功通过了临床前和临床试验,并获得了许可。特别讨论的主题是与主要疫苗的短期效果有关的方面,因此建议重新接种疫苗。假设在SARS-CoV-2表面表达不止一种抗原决定因子。在结论段中,我们就许多国家在COVID-19疫苗接种过程中人口中最热门的情境问题提出了自己的概念。如果即使在实际健康的个体中也可能出现导致残疾和死亡的并发症,更不用说患有慢性疾病的老年人了,那么接种疫苗是否值得?在作出积极决定时,出现了选择疫苗的问题,因为疫苗在不同的国家使用,在生产疫苗时使用不同的科学、方法和技术方法。首次接种后短时间内是否需要再次接种?通常,建议在第一次接种后的14-30天内重新接种疫苗。在这方面,人们担心疫苗的效力低(选择性免疫原性活性弱)。如果患者的SARS-CoV-2抗体水平很高,那么在恢复期以及接下来的一到两个月里“全面”接种疫苗(如果没有禁忌症)有多有利?在重新接种疫苗的情况下,有必要查明是否有可能使用另一家制造商的商业疫苗进行第二次接种,特别是因为许多发展中国家目前没有在第一次接种期间引入的这种疫苗。在同一时间内或以最短的时间间隔为大范围健康个体接种COVID-19和流感疫苗的能力如何?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信