A Comparative Analysis of the Agile and Traditional Software Development Processes Productivity

W. Carvalho, P. F. Rosa, M. S. Soares, Marco Antonio Teixeira da Cunha, Luiz Carlos Buiatte
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of the Agile and Traditional Software Development Processes Productivity","authors":"W. Carvalho, P. F. Rosa, M. S. Soares, Marco Antonio Teixeira da Cunha, Luiz Carlos Buiatte","doi":"10.1109/SCCC.2011.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software development processes are essential for an organization to obtain the required levels of productivity and quality. The productivity analysis of agile and traditional development processes is an open and few explored research area, which has attracted the interest of industrial and academic fellows in order to take advantage of the strengths of both approaches. This research aims to investigate good options for agile and traditional integration by defining a hybrid process that takes advantage of both approaches. An empirical study aiming to evaluate the productivity impact of the proposed hybrid process was carried out in a Brazilian CMMI v.1.1 Maturity Level 2 medium-sized company. Five groups of similar projects were compared with respect to productivity, some of which were developed using the new hybrid process and others were developed using the older RUP-based process. Quantitative results have shown that four out of five project groups showed significant productivity increase in Scrum-RUP projects. The study shows that it is possible to integrate agile practices in the software development process without losing the rigor needed in the desired sub processes and still get real development productivity gain.","PeriodicalId":173639,"journal":{"name":"2011 30th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 30th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCCC.2011.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Software development processes are essential for an organization to obtain the required levels of productivity and quality. The productivity analysis of agile and traditional development processes is an open and few explored research area, which has attracted the interest of industrial and academic fellows in order to take advantage of the strengths of both approaches. This research aims to investigate good options for agile and traditional integration by defining a hybrid process that takes advantage of both approaches. An empirical study aiming to evaluate the productivity impact of the proposed hybrid process was carried out in a Brazilian CMMI v.1.1 Maturity Level 2 medium-sized company. Five groups of similar projects were compared with respect to productivity, some of which were developed using the new hybrid process and others were developed using the older RUP-based process. Quantitative results have shown that four out of five project groups showed significant productivity increase in Scrum-RUP projects. The study shows that it is possible to integrate agile practices in the software development process without losing the rigor needed in the desired sub processes and still get real development productivity gain.
敏捷与传统软件开发过程生产率的比较分析
软件开发过程对于组织获得所需的生产力和质量水平是必不可少的。敏捷开发过程和传统开发过程的生产力分析是一个开放且很少被探索的研究领域,为了利用这两种方法的优势,它吸引了工业界和学术界的研究人员的兴趣。本研究的目的是通过定义一个利用敏捷和传统集成两种方法的混合过程来研究敏捷和传统集成的良好选择。一项旨在评估所提出的混合过程对生产率影响的实证研究在一家巴西CMMI v.1.1成熟度等级2的中型公司中进行。五组类似的项目在生产力方面进行了比较,其中一些是使用新的混合过程开发的,而另一些是使用旧的基于rup的过程开发的。定量结果显示,五个项目组中有四个在Scrum-RUP项目中显示出显著的生产力增长。研究表明,在软件开发过程中集成敏捷实践是可能的,而不会失去所需子过程中所需的严谨性,并且仍然可以获得真正的开发生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信