Mathematical Model and Simulation for Improving Brake, Bump and Roll Steers in Light Commercial Vehicle (LCV)

Mahadevan Pichandi, Satish Kumar R
{"title":"Mathematical Model and Simulation for Improving Brake, Bump and Roll Steers in Light Commercial Vehicle (LCV)","authors":"Mahadevan Pichandi, Satish Kumar R","doi":"10.37285/ajmt.3.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to recent infrastructural developments and emerging competitive automotive market in India, there is seen a huge shift in customer demand and vehicle drivability pattern for small commercial vehicles. Various factors contributing to driver’s fatigue include driver negligence, inappropriate driving habits and vehicle inherent design error due to which a driver is forced to make frequent steering wheel corrections so as to make the vehicle run in a straight line. Thus, optimization of steering, suspension and front axle geometry becomes important for improving the overall vehicle drivability and reducing the driver fatigue. Mentioned herewith are the major kinematic characteristics in a vehicle which plays vital role for ensuring vehicle improved drivability – Brake steer, Bump steer, Roll steer and Ackerman Geometry. As on today, the above analysis for deriving optimized linkages hard points for steering, suspension and front axle system are done in customized Multi body dynamics software’s like ADAMS/Trucksim. Although the derived hard points in such MBD software’s are precise yet there are several drawbacks in such approach like increase in overall project time plan, mainly due to the vehicle packaging issues for the proposed hard points and also these software customized license and AMC are quite high which increases the overall operating cost of a project. In this paper, an approach has been developed so as to derive these linkages hard points through mathematical calculation and kinematic simulation model in product design Catia platform itself. This helps the designer to derive the optimized hard points of linkages for “n” number of design iterations at the concept stage itself. Thus, this design methodology saves not only on the project design cost but also it reduces the overall product design lifecycle and gives the respective designer to choose the optimum hard point based upon the vehicle packaging feasibility Brake steer, Bump steer, Roll steer, Catia 2D layout, Camber, TCD, Ackermann error. \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":294802,"journal":{"name":"ARAI Journal of Mobility Technology","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARAI Journal of Mobility Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37285/ajmt.3.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to recent infrastructural developments and emerging competitive automotive market in India, there is seen a huge shift in customer demand and vehicle drivability pattern for small commercial vehicles. Various factors contributing to driver’s fatigue include driver negligence, inappropriate driving habits and vehicle inherent design error due to which a driver is forced to make frequent steering wheel corrections so as to make the vehicle run in a straight line. Thus, optimization of steering, suspension and front axle geometry becomes important for improving the overall vehicle drivability and reducing the driver fatigue. Mentioned herewith are the major kinematic characteristics in a vehicle which plays vital role for ensuring vehicle improved drivability – Brake steer, Bump steer, Roll steer and Ackerman Geometry. As on today, the above analysis for deriving optimized linkages hard points for steering, suspension and front axle system are done in customized Multi body dynamics software’s like ADAMS/Trucksim. Although the derived hard points in such MBD software’s are precise yet there are several drawbacks in such approach like increase in overall project time plan, mainly due to the vehicle packaging issues for the proposed hard points and also these software customized license and AMC are quite high which increases the overall operating cost of a project. In this paper, an approach has been developed so as to derive these linkages hard points through mathematical calculation and kinematic simulation model in product design Catia platform itself. This helps the designer to derive the optimized hard points of linkages for “n” number of design iterations at the concept stage itself. Thus, this design methodology saves not only on the project design cost but also it reduces the overall product design lifecycle and gives the respective designer to choose the optimum hard point based upon the vehicle packaging feasibility Brake steer, Bump steer, Roll steer, Catia 2D layout, Camber, TCD, Ackermann error.    
改进轻型商用车制动、侧摇转向系统的数学模型与仿真
由于印度最近的基础设施发展和新兴的竞争激烈的汽车市场,小型商用车的客户需求和车辆驾驶模式发生了巨大变化。造成驾驶员疲劳的因素包括驾驶员的疏忽、不适当的驾驶习惯和车辆固有的设计错误,由于这种设计错误,驾驶员被迫频繁地修正方向盘,以使车辆在直线上行驶。因此,转向、悬架和前桥几何形状的优化对于提高车辆的整体驾驶性能和减少驾驶员疲劳变得非常重要。这里提到的是车辆的主要运动学特性,它们对确保车辆的驾驶性能起着至关重要的作用——制动转向、颠簸转向、侧倾转向和阿克曼几何。到目前为止,上述分析是在定制的多体动力学软件如ADAMS/Trucksim中完成的,用于导出优化的转向、悬架和前桥系统的连杆硬点。虽然这种MBD软件的派生硬点是精确的,但是这种方法也有一些缺点,比如增加了整个项目的时间计划,主要是由于提出的硬点的车辆包装问题,而且这些软件定制许可证和AMC相当高,这增加了项目的总体运营成本。本文提出了一种通过Catia平台本身的数学计算和运动学仿真模型推导出这些连杆硬点的方法。这有助于设计师在概念阶段本身的n次设计迭代中推导出优化的连杆硬点。因此,该设计方法不仅节省了项目设计成本,而且缩短了整体产品设计生命周期,并使各自的设计人员能够根据车辆包装可行性选择最佳硬点。制动转向,碰撞转向,侧倾转向,Catia 2D布局,Camber, TCD, Ackermann误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信