Collective bargaining

Virginia Doellgast, C. Benassi
{"title":"Collective bargaining","authors":"Virginia Doellgast, C. Benassi","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvh8r1pn.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Excerpt] In this chapter, we first present an overview of different forms of collective bargaining, looking at how institutions and models differ across countries. This is the basis for a review of research examining the integrative or efficiency-enhancing role of collective bargaining which typically emphasizes strategic choice and mutual gains, and studies focusing on the distributional consequences of these institutions which place more emphasis on the role of power and conflict in shaping bargaining processes and outcomes. We argue that research focusing on performance outcomes provides a useful but incomplete set of tools to analyze the form and consequences of collective bargaining institutions. These institutions have historically played a central role in redistributing political and economic power within workplaces, industries, and societies. Attention to contemporary changes in labor power can help to explain why and how this distinctive form of employee voice has been weakened within different national contexts.","PeriodicalId":148996,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Research on Employee Voice","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Research on Employee Voice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh8r1pn.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Excerpt] In this chapter, we first present an overview of different forms of collective bargaining, looking at how institutions and models differ across countries. This is the basis for a review of research examining the integrative or efficiency-enhancing role of collective bargaining which typically emphasizes strategic choice and mutual gains, and studies focusing on the distributional consequences of these institutions which place more emphasis on the role of power and conflict in shaping bargaining processes and outcomes. We argue that research focusing on performance outcomes provides a useful but incomplete set of tools to analyze the form and consequences of collective bargaining institutions. These institutions have historically played a central role in redistributing political and economic power within workplaces, industries, and societies. Attention to contemporary changes in labor power can help to explain why and how this distinctive form of employee voice has been weakened within different national contexts.
集体谈判权
在本章中,我们首先概述了不同形式的集体谈判,看看各国的制度和模式有何不同。这是审查集体谈判的综合或提高效率作用的研究的基础,这些研究通常强调战略选择和互利,以及关注这些机构的分配后果的研究,这些研究更强调权力和冲突在形成谈判过程和结果中的作用。我们认为,关注绩效结果的研究为分析集体谈判制度的形式和后果提供了一套有用但不完整的工具。历史上,这些机构在重新分配工作场所、行业和社会的政治和经济权力方面发挥了核心作用。关注当代劳动力的变化可以帮助解释为什么以及如何在不同的国家背景下这种独特的员工声音被削弱了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信