Dijital Nöropsikoloji: Yaşlı Bireylerin Bilişsel İşlevlerinin Değerlendirilmesinde Kullanılan Teknolojik Yaklaşımlar

Elif Yıldırım
{"title":"Dijital Nöropsikoloji: Yaşlı Bireylerin Bilişsel İşlevlerinin Değerlendirilmesinde Kullanılan Teknolojik Yaklaşımlar","authors":"Elif Yıldırım","doi":"10.26650/sp2021-963370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consistent with the growth in aging population, the number of individuals with dementia is increasing. There is an agreement regarding the essential role of neuropsychological assessment in the early detection of cognitive decline, which is crucial in improving the course of dementia. Neuropsychological assessment that is usually applied with classical paper-pencil tests became digitalized with advancing technology. This digitalization spread rapidly, especially with the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to investigate the digital approaches that are used in the neuropsychological assessment of older adults. In this context, a critical review of digital approaches, including teleneuropsychology, computerized neuropsychological assessment batteries, mobile technology or web-based assessment tools, and innovative technological methods, such as virtual and augmented reality has been conducted. The results of teleneuropsychology studies, which focused on remote administration of neuropsychological tests usually via videoconference, indicated that this method is reliable and valid. Computerized batteries and methods based on mobile technology provide an opportunity for self-testing in nonclinical settings and a background for follow-up studies with large samples. Although assessment methods using new technologies, such as virtual reality, are still in their infancy, they have great potential for more sensitive measurements. The majority of the methods involved in digital approaches, which have advantages such as increased accessibility and standardization of measurements, revealed consistent results with classical paper-pencil tests and patients' diagnosis. However, a detailed psychometric analysis and best practice guidelines of the digital approaches are still lacking. Moreover, digital approaches can present a challenge in the clinician-patient relationship and have limitations in patient observation during testing. Despite the limitations due to digital neuropsychology applications, digital approaches have the potential to provide important benefits to patients, professionals in the area, and the health system. In this respect, academic and clinical studies that would benefit all parties are important.","PeriodicalId":224243,"journal":{"name":"Psikoloji Çalışmaları / Studies in Psychology","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psikoloji Çalışmaları / Studies in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/sp2021-963370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consistent with the growth in aging population, the number of individuals with dementia is increasing. There is an agreement regarding the essential role of neuropsychological assessment in the early detection of cognitive decline, which is crucial in improving the course of dementia. Neuropsychological assessment that is usually applied with classical paper-pencil tests became digitalized with advancing technology. This digitalization spread rapidly, especially with the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to investigate the digital approaches that are used in the neuropsychological assessment of older adults. In this context, a critical review of digital approaches, including teleneuropsychology, computerized neuropsychological assessment batteries, mobile technology or web-based assessment tools, and innovative technological methods, such as virtual and augmented reality has been conducted. The results of teleneuropsychology studies, which focused on remote administration of neuropsychological tests usually via videoconference, indicated that this method is reliable and valid. Computerized batteries and methods based on mobile technology provide an opportunity for self-testing in nonclinical settings and a background for follow-up studies with large samples. Although assessment methods using new technologies, such as virtual reality, are still in their infancy, they have great potential for more sensitive measurements. The majority of the methods involved in digital approaches, which have advantages such as increased accessibility and standardization of measurements, revealed consistent results with classical paper-pencil tests and patients' diagnosis. However, a detailed psychometric analysis and best practice guidelines of the digital approaches are still lacking. Moreover, digital approaches can present a challenge in the clinician-patient relationship and have limitations in patient observation during testing. Despite the limitations due to digital neuropsychology applications, digital approaches have the potential to provide important benefits to patients, professionals in the area, and the health system. In this respect, academic and clinical studies that would benefit all parties are important.
与人口老龄化的增长相一致,痴呆症患者的数量也在增加。人们一致认为,神经心理学评估在早期发现认知能力下降方面发挥着重要作用,这对改善痴呆症的病程至关重要。随着技术的进步,通常应用于经典纸笔测试的神经心理评估变得数字化。这种数字化传播迅速,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间。本研究旨在探讨用于老年人神经心理评估的数字方法。在此背景下,对数字方法进行了批判性审查,包括远程神经心理学,计算机化神经心理学评估电池,移动技术或基于网络的评估工具,以及创新的技术方法,如虚拟和增强现实。远程神经心理学研究的结果表明,这种方法是可靠和有效的,主要是通过视频会议进行远程神经心理测试。计算机化的电池和基于移动技术的方法为非临床环境中的自我测试提供了机会,并为大样本的后续研究提供了背景。尽管使用虚拟现实等新技术的评估方法仍处于起步阶段,但它们具有实现更灵敏测量的巨大潜力。数字方法所涉及的大多数方法具有诸如增加可及性和测量标准化等优点,其结果与传统的纸笔测试和患者诊断一致。然而,详细的心理测量分析和数字方法的最佳实践指南仍然缺乏。此外,数字方法可以在临床-患者关系中提出挑战,并且在测试过程中对患者观察有限制。尽管由于数字神经心理学应用的局限性,数字方法有可能为患者、该领域的专业人员和卫生系统提供重要的好处。在这方面,有利于各方的学术和临床研究是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信