Performance Analysis of POX and Ryu with Different SDN Topologies

Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information Science and Systems Pub Date : 2018-04-27 DOI:10.1145/3209914.3209931

Jehad Ali, Seungwoon Lee, B. Roh

引用次数: 28

Abstract

This paper deals with the performance comparison of two python-based Software Defined Network (SDN) controllers i.e. POX and Ryu under different network topologies such as Single, Linear, Tree, Dumbbell, Data Center Networks (DCN) and Software-Defined naval networks which use satellite communication systems (SATCOM) i.e. SDN-SAT [1]. Experimental results, validated through Mininet has clearly indicated that Ryu has superior performance i.e. A TCP throughput increase of 25.56%, 282.54%, 44.85%, 19.88%, 45.45% and latency decrease of 93.48%, 99.96%, 99.90%, 97.08%, 99.33% in single, linear, tree, dumbbell and DCN topologies respectively. Similarly, in SDN-SAT topology Ryu has 0.21% increase in TCP throughput and 34.62% decrease in latency as compared to POX controller.

查看原文本刊更多论文

不同SDN拓扑下POX和Ryu的性能分析

本文讨论了两种基于python的软件定义网络(SDN)控制器(即POX和Ryu)在不同网络拓扑下的性能比较，如单、线性、树、哑铃、数据中心网络(DCN)和使用卫星通信系统(SATCOM)即SDN- sat的软件定义海军网络[1]。通过Mininet验证的实验结果清楚地表明，Ryu在单拓扑、线性拓扑、树拓扑、哑铃拓扑和DCN拓扑下，TCP吞吐量分别提高了25.56%、282.54%、44.85%、19.88%、45.45%，时延分别降低了93.48%、99.96%、99.90%、97.08%、99.33%。同样，在SDN-SAT拓扑中，Ryu与POX控制器相比，TCP吞吐量增加了0.21%，延迟减少了34.62%。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information Science and Systems

自引率

0.00%

发文量