‘Full cause of weeping’: Affective Failure in The Queen (2006) and The Crown (2019)

Bethany Layne
{"title":"‘Full cause of weeping’: Affective Failure in The Queen (2006) and The Crown (2019)","authors":"Bethany Layne","doi":"10.21827/ejlw.10.37912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reads The Crown, Series Three, Episode Three, ‘Aberfan’, as an adaptation of The Queen, both of which were written by Peter Morgan. Each focuses on a crisis in public relations emerging from Elizabeth II’s delayed reaction to a tragedy: the mining disaster in The Crown and the death of Princess Diana in The Queen. Both are double portraits, in which the monarch’s affective failure is contrasted with the more humane response of the prime minister, Harold Wilson and Tony Blair respectively. And both texts explore the tension between private grief and public performance. By reading these texts in dialogue, their relevance to their contemporary contexts is magnified. The Queen uses Elizabeth II’s nadir in public relations to comment on Blair’s fall from grace as a result of the Iraq War, while ‘Aberfan’, by emphasising the avoidable nature of the disaster, comments on the Grenfell Tower fire of 2017. While neither text shrinks from criticising the monarch for her breakdown in empathy, the resonances between Aberfan and Grenfell allow the Queen’s immediate and humane response in 2017 to redeem her delayed reactions in the past. This demonstrates the capacity of fictional texts to intervene in the popular perception of their subjects.","PeriodicalId":106040,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Life Writing","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Life Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21827/ejlw.10.37912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article reads The Crown, Series Three, Episode Three, ‘Aberfan’, as an adaptation of The Queen, both of which were written by Peter Morgan. Each focuses on a crisis in public relations emerging from Elizabeth II’s delayed reaction to a tragedy: the mining disaster in The Crown and the death of Princess Diana in The Queen. Both are double portraits, in which the monarch’s affective failure is contrasted with the more humane response of the prime minister, Harold Wilson and Tony Blair respectively. And both texts explore the tension between private grief and public performance. By reading these texts in dialogue, their relevance to their contemporary contexts is magnified. The Queen uses Elizabeth II’s nadir in public relations to comment on Blair’s fall from grace as a result of the Iraq War, while ‘Aberfan’, by emphasising the avoidable nature of the disaster, comments on the Grenfell Tower fire of 2017. While neither text shrinks from criticising the monarch for her breakdown in empathy, the resonances between Aberfan and Grenfell allow the Queen’s immediate and humane response in 2017 to redeem her delayed reactions in the past. This demonstrates the capacity of fictional texts to intervene in the popular perception of their subjects.
“哭泣的全部原因”:《女王》(2006)和《王冠》(2019)中的情感失败
这篇文章读的是《王冠》,第三季,第三集,“阿伯凡”,改编自《女王》,这两部剧都是由彼得·摩根写的。每一部都聚焦于伊丽莎白二世对一场悲剧的滞后反应所引发的公共关系危机:《王冠》中的矿难和《女王》中的戴安娜王妃之死。这两幅画都是双重肖像,在这幅画中,君主情感上的失败与首相哈罗德•威尔逊(Harold Wilson)和托尼•布莱尔(Tony Blair)更为人道的回应形成了对比。两篇文章都探讨了私人悲伤和公共表演之间的紧张关系。通过对话阅读这些文本,它们与当代语境的相关性被放大了。女王用伊丽莎白二世在公共关系上的最低点来评论布莱尔因伊拉克战争而失势,而“Aberfan”则通过强调灾难的可避免性来评论2017年格伦费尔大厦的火灾。虽然这两篇文章都批评女王缺乏同情心,但阿伯凡和格伦费尔之间的共鸣让女王在2017年立即做出了人道的回应,弥补了她过去的延迟反应。这证明了虚构文本介入大众对其主题认知的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信