In Pursuit of Moral Synergy between Research and Industry in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Zimbabwe, Sharing Mixed Methods Methodology Experiences to Prospective Scholars

Philemon K Kwaramba, Jameson Kurasha, Lighton Dube
{"title":"In Pursuit of Moral Synergy between Research and Industry in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Zimbabwe, Sharing Mixed Methods Methodology Experiences to Prospective Scholars","authors":"Philemon K Kwaramba, Jameson Kurasha, Lighton Dube","doi":"10.24940/theijhss/2023/v11/i4/hs2304-019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Zimbabwe has consistently received high-level calls for moral synergy between research and industry (R-I). Bi-annual research symposia always share this thematic message. Statutory instruments establishing Zimbabwe technical universities explicitly support R-I synergy. The Constitution of Scientific and Industrial Research and Development Centre (SIRDC), registered under the Research Act Chapter 10:22, supports the commercialisation of research output. The Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries (CZIs) supports the call for synergy by establishing a Standing Committee on research and development (R&D). Despite this noble call, a moral synergy between R and I seems to have been resisted. This prompted this author to pursue doctoral studies to find out why a moral synergy between research and industry has been repetitively resisted. Theories that guided the research included: \n \nThe Stage-Gate ® Process, where novelty, teamwork and customer service are prioritised, \nThe Technology Diffusion, which gives paths for innovations to be successfully transferred from academia into industry, \nThe Triple Helix, which shares the relationships among academia, industry and the Government and \nThe Systems Approach, which places emphasis on a holistic view and the feedback extent \n \nMixed methods methodology was the chosen research paradigm, with qualitative component dominating (QUAL-QUANT). Researchers and experts working in both industry and academia were covered. According to the study, both academia and industry admit that synergy was very low, between 30 and 40%. Neither side was working to mitigate the negative position. Novelty, teamwork, customer audience and emphasis on feedback were rare. For students choosing pragmatism paradigm in their studies, they: \n \nShould have all necessary authorisations ready \nMust have a thorough knowledge of the subject area they have chosen so they ask essential questions \nMust be prepared to land into some past 'storm' \nObserve ethics \nHave a strong command of philosophical foundations. \n \nIt was also found out that the moral synergy between research and industry was low due to circumstances beyond academia and industry control. Skills flight, poor infrastructure support (energy supply, ICT, absence of laboratory instruments/consumables), limited exposure to best practices and absence of mentors weighed in negatively. However, the lessons learnt led to the identification of x-factor aspects that needed attention for moral research-industry synergy to be realised.","PeriodicalId":421273,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies","volume":"235 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2023/v11/i4/hs2304-019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Zimbabwe has consistently received high-level calls for moral synergy between research and industry (R-I). Bi-annual research symposia always share this thematic message. Statutory instruments establishing Zimbabwe technical universities explicitly support R-I synergy. The Constitution of Scientific and Industrial Research and Development Centre (SIRDC), registered under the Research Act Chapter 10:22, supports the commercialisation of research output. The Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries (CZIs) supports the call for synergy by establishing a Standing Committee on research and development (R&D). Despite this noble call, a moral synergy between R and I seems to have been resisted. This prompted this author to pursue doctoral studies to find out why a moral synergy between research and industry has been repetitively resisted. Theories that guided the research included: The Stage-Gate ® Process, where novelty, teamwork and customer service are prioritised, The Technology Diffusion, which gives paths for innovations to be successfully transferred from academia into industry, The Triple Helix, which shares the relationships among academia, industry and the Government and The Systems Approach, which places emphasis on a holistic view and the feedback extent Mixed methods methodology was the chosen research paradigm, with qualitative component dominating (QUAL-QUANT). Researchers and experts working in both industry and academia were covered. According to the study, both academia and industry admit that synergy was very low, between 30 and 40%. Neither side was working to mitigate the negative position. Novelty, teamwork, customer audience and emphasis on feedback were rare. For students choosing pragmatism paradigm in their studies, they: Should have all necessary authorisations ready Must have a thorough knowledge of the subject area they have chosen so they ask essential questions Must be prepared to land into some past 'storm' Observe ethics Have a strong command of philosophical foundations. It was also found out that the moral synergy between research and industry was low due to circumstances beyond academia and industry control. Skills flight, poor infrastructure support (energy supply, ICT, absence of laboratory instruments/consumables), limited exposure to best practices and absence of mentors weighed in negatively. However, the lessons learnt led to the identification of x-factor aspects that needed attention for moral research-industry synergy to be realised.
发展中国家科研与产业的道德协同:以津巴布韦为例,与未来学者分享混合方法的方法论经验
津巴布韦一直收到高级别呼吁,要求在研究和工业之间建立道德协同作用(R-I)。两年一次的研究研讨会总是分享这一主题信息。建立津巴布韦技术大学的法律文书明确支持R-I协同作用。根据《研究法》第10:22章注册的科学和工业研究与发展中心(SIRDC)的章程支持研究成果的商业化。津巴布韦工业联合会(CZIs)通过设立一个研究与发展常设委员会来支持协同作用的呼吁。尽管这一崇高的呼吁,R和I之间的道德协同作用似乎受到了抵制。这促使作者继续博士研究,以找出为什么研究和工业之间的道德协同作用一再受到抵制。指导这项研究的理论包括:“阶段-门”过程,新新性,团队合作和客户服务是优先考虑的;“技术扩散”,为创新从学术界成功转移到工业界提供了途径;“三重螺旋”,分享了学术界,工业界和政府之间的关系;“系统方法”,强调整体观点和反馈程度。以定性成分为主(quality - quant)。研究人员和专家工作在工业界和学术界都包括在内。根据这项研究,学术界和工业界都承认协同效应非常低,在30%到40%之间。双方都没有努力缓和负面立场。新奇、团队合作、客户群体和对反馈的重视都很少见。对于在学习中选择实用主义范式的学生,他们:应该准备好所有必要的授权必须对他们选择的学科领域有透彻的了解,以便他们提出必要的问题必须准备好进入一些过去的“风暴”遵守道德规范有很强的哲学基础。研究还发现,由于学术界和工业界无法控制的情况,研究与产业之间的道德协同作用较低。技能流失、基础设施支持不足(能源供应、信息通信技术、缺乏实验室仪器/消耗品)、接触最佳实践的机会有限以及缺乏导师,这些都是负面因素。然而,吸取的经验教训导致确定了需要注意的x因素方面,以实现道德研究-产业协同作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信