Comparing Contact Stress Estimates of Some Straight Bevel Gears With ISO 10300 Standards

E. Osakue, Lucky Anetor
{"title":"Comparing Contact Stress Estimates of Some Straight Bevel Gears With ISO 10300 Standards","authors":"E. Osakue, Lucky Anetor","doi":"10.1115/IMECE2018-86572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pitting resistance of straight bevel gears, like other gears, is commonly assessed on the basis of the contact stress in a gear mesh. A new contact stress model for straight bevel gears is used to estimate the contact stress in some gearset designs and compared with predictions from ISO 10300 bevel gear standards. In the cases considered, the new model contact stresses defer from the ISO values in the range of 13% to 33%, with the ISO predictions generally on the higher side. These deviations appear to be somewhat high but not unreasonable because of obvious differences in the two models. The ISO standard uses the mid facewidth cone radius in its contact stress model while the new model uses the cone backend radius which is larger than the mid facewidth cone radius. Another contributing factor is that the load service factor values evaluated from ISO methods are generally higher than those of the new model values, based largely on American Gear Manufacturers Association (AGMA) methods. It should be noted that the power ratings for all the design cases studied are below 10 kW.","PeriodicalId":201128,"journal":{"name":"Volume 13: Design, Reliability, Safety, and Risk","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 13: Design, Reliability, Safety, and Risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2018-86572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The pitting resistance of straight bevel gears, like other gears, is commonly assessed on the basis of the contact stress in a gear mesh. A new contact stress model for straight bevel gears is used to estimate the contact stress in some gearset designs and compared with predictions from ISO 10300 bevel gear standards. In the cases considered, the new model contact stresses defer from the ISO values in the range of 13% to 33%, with the ISO predictions generally on the higher side. These deviations appear to be somewhat high but not unreasonable because of obvious differences in the two models. The ISO standard uses the mid facewidth cone radius in its contact stress model while the new model uses the cone backend radius which is larger than the mid facewidth cone radius. Another contributing factor is that the load service factor values evaluated from ISO methods are generally higher than those of the new model values, based largely on American Gear Manufacturers Association (AGMA) methods. It should be noted that the power ratings for all the design cases studied are below 10 kW.
比较一些直齿锥齿轮与ISO 10300标准的接触应力估计
与其他齿轮一样,直齿锥齿轮的抗点蚀性通常是根据齿轮啮合中的接触应力来评估的。采用一种新的直齿锥齿轮接触应力模型对某些齿轮组设计中的接触应力进行了估计,并与ISO 10300锥齿轮标准的预测结果进行了比较。在考虑的情况下,新模型的接触应力从ISO值延迟到13%到33%的范围内,ISO预测通常在较高的一侧。由于两种模型的明显差异,这些偏差似乎有些高,但并非不合理。ISO标准在其接触应力模型中使用面宽中锥半径,而新模型使用比面宽中锥半径更大的锥后端半径。另一个贡献因素是,从ISO方法评估的负载服务系数值通常高于新模型值,主要基于美国齿轮制造商协会(AGMA)方法。值得注意的是,所有研究的设计案例的额定功率都低于10kw。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信