Unconsciousness

L. M. Johnson
{"title":"Unconsciousness","authors":"L. M. Johnson","doi":"10.1093/med/9780190943646.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neuroscientific knowledge about disorders of consciousness has rapidly developed in recent decades, expanding the diagnostic categories. This chapter describes the disorders and what is known about them and traces their medical and ethical history, examining how old and dogmatic certainties have given way to new and urgent uncertainties. Bioethical and philosophical discourses have not adequately kept pace with what is known and unknown about these disorders. It is argued that there is a need to reconsider outdated ethical conclusions and to revise the taxonomy of these orders, both to excise stigmatizing terms like vegetative, to more accurately reflect the changing and mercurial clinical picture, and to knock down the monoliths of conscious and unconscious.","PeriodicalId":167181,"journal":{"name":"The Ethics of Uncertainty","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Ethics of Uncertainty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190943646.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Neuroscientific knowledge about disorders of consciousness has rapidly developed in recent decades, expanding the diagnostic categories. This chapter describes the disorders and what is known about them and traces their medical and ethical history, examining how old and dogmatic certainties have given way to new and urgent uncertainties. Bioethical and philosophical discourses have not adequately kept pace with what is known and unknown about these disorders. It is argued that there is a need to reconsider outdated ethical conclusions and to revise the taxonomy of these orders, both to excise stigmatizing terms like vegetative, to more accurately reflect the changing and mercurial clinical picture, and to knock down the monoliths of conscious and unconscious.
无意识
近几十年来,关于意识障碍的神经科学知识迅速发展,扩大了诊断类别。这一章描述了这些疾病以及对它们的了解,并追溯了它们的医学和伦理历史,研究了古老的教条确定性是如何让位于新的紧迫的不确定性的。生物伦理学和哲学论述没有充分跟上这些疾病的已知和未知。有人认为,有必要重新考虑过时的伦理结论,并修改这些目的分类,既要去除像植物人这样的污名化术语,更准确地反映变化无常的临床情况,也要打倒有意识和无意识的巨石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信